Difference between revisions of "Annotation:Annotationen:How Do We Mean A Constructivist Sketch of Semantics/Ebc43zoltc"
(Created page with "{{Beispiel3}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Annotationen:How_Do_We_Mean_A_Constructivist_Sketch_of_Semantics |LastModificationDate=2019-08-21T17:15:06.429Z |LastModificationU...") |
|||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{TextAnnotation | {{TextAnnotation | ||
|AnnotationOf=Annotationen:How_Do_We_Mean_A_Constructivist_Sketch_of_Semantics | |AnnotationOf=Annotationen:How_Do_We_Mean_A_Constructivist_Sketch_of_Semantics | ||
− | |LastModificationDate=2019-08-21T17:15: | + | |AnnotationComment=A striking example are the constellations we all can learn to see, name, and recognize on a clear night. Take the one called Cassiopeia. It has been know |
+ | n since the beginning human history. The Greeks saw it as the crown of a mythical queen and gave it her name. We see it more prosaically as a “W” in the vicinity of the Polar Star. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Fig.4: The Constellation of Cassiopeia If you consider the relative distances of the individual stars it becomes clear that there is only a very small area of the universe (as astronomers have taught us to conceive it) from which the five stars could be said to form a double-u. Move the observer a few light-years to the right or the left, the double-u would disappear. Move the ob | ||
+ | server 50 light-years forward, and he or she could construct only a triangle with the three stars that remained in front. | ||
+ | |LastModificationDate=2019-08-21T17:15:30.888Z | ||
|LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler | |LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler | ||
− | |AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Ebc43zoltc","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ3Ӻ","startOffset":326,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ3Ӻ/pӶ1Ӻ","endOffset":506°Ӻ,"quote":"A striking example are the constellations we all can learn to see, name, and recognize on a clear night. Take the one called Cassiopeia. It has been known since the beginning human history. The Greeks saw it as the crown of a mythical queen and gave it her name. We see it more prosaically as a “W” in the vicinity of the Polar Star. \n\nFig.4: The Constellation of Cassiopeia \nIf you consider the relative distances of the individual stars it becomes clear that there is only a very small area of the universe (as astronomers have taught us to conceive it) from which the five stars could be said to form a double-u. Move the observer a few light-years to the right or the left, the double-u would disappear. Move the observer 50 light-years forward, and he or she could construct only a triangle with the three stars that remained in front.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321051508804293252722":^°°,^"jQuery321051508804293252722":^°°,^"jQuery321051508804293252722":^°°,^"jQuery321051508804293252722":^°°Ӻ,"text":" | + | |AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Ebc43zoltc","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ3Ӻ","startOffset":326,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ3Ӻ/pӶ1Ӻ","endOffset":506°Ӻ,"quote":"A striking example are the constellations we all can learn to see, name, and recognize on a clear night. Take the one called Cassiopeia. It has been known since the beginning human history. The Greeks saw it as the crown of a mythical queen and gave it her name. We see it more prosaically as a “W” in the vicinity of the Polar Star. \n\nFig.4: The Constellation of Cassiopeia \nIf you consider the relative distances of the individual stars it becomes clear that there is only a very small area of the universe (as astronomers have taught us to conceive it) from which the five stars could be said to form a double-u. Move the observer a few light-years to the right or the left, the double-u would disappear. Move the observer 50 light-years forward, and he or she could construct only a triangle with the three stars that remained in front.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321051508804293252722":^°°,^"jQuery321051508804293252722":^°°,^"jQuery321051508804293252722":^°°,^"jQuery321051508804293252722":^°°Ӻ,"text":"A striking example are the constellations we all can learn to see, name, and recognize on a clear night. Take the one called Cassiopeia. It has been know\nn since the beginning human history. The Greeks saw it as the crown of a mythical queen and gave it her name. We see it more prosaically as a “W” in the vicinity of the Polar Star.\n\n\nFig.4: The Constellation of Cassiopeia If you consider the relative distances of the individual stars it becomes clear that there is only a very small area of the universe (as astronomers have taught us to conceive it) from which the five stars could be said to form a double-u. Move the observer a few light-years to the right or the left, the double-u would disappear. Move the ob\nserver 50 light-years forward, and he or she could construct only a triangle with the three stars that remained in front.","category":"Beispiel3","data_creacio":1566400506067° |
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 17:15, 21 August 2019
Annotation of | Annotationen:How_Do_We_Mean_A_Constructivist_Sketch_of_Semantics |
---|---|
Annotation Comment | A striking example are the constellations we all can learn to see, name, and recognize on a clear night. Take the one called Cassiopeia. It has been know
n since the beginning human history. The Greeks saw it as the crown of a mythical queen and gave it her name. We see it more prosaically as a “W” in the vicinity of the Polar Star.
|
Last Modification Date | 2019-08-21T17:15:30.888Z |
Last Modification User | User:Sarah Oberbichler |
Annotation Metadata | ^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Ebc43zoltc","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ3Ӻ","startOffset":326,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ3Ӻ/pӶ1Ӻ","endOffset":506°Ӻ,"quote":"A striking example are the constellations we all can learn to see, name, and recognize on a clear night. Take the one called Cassiopeia. It has been known since the beginning human history. The Greeks saw it as the crown of a mythical queen and gave it her name. We see it more prosaically as a “W” in the vicinity of the Polar Star. \n\nFig.4: The Constellation of Cassiopeia \nIf you consider the relative distances of the individual stars it becomes clear that there is only a very small area of the universe (as astronomers have taught us to conceive it) from which the five stars could be said to form a double-u. Move the observer a few light-years to the right or the left, the double-u would disappear. Move the observer 50 light-years forward, and he or she could construct only a triangle with the three stars that remained in front.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321051508804293252722":^°°,^"jQuery321051508804293252722":^°°,^"jQuery321051508804293252722":^°°,^"jQuery321051508804293252722":^°°Ӻ,"text":"A striking example are the constellations we all can learn to see, name, and recognize on a clear night. Take the one called Cassiopeia. It has been know\nn since the beginning human history. The Greeks saw it as the crown of a mythical queen and gave it her name. We see it more prosaically as a “W” in the vicinity of the Polar Star.\n\n\nFig.4: The Constellation of Cassiopeia If you consider the relative distances of the individual stars it becomes clear that there is only a very small area of the universe (as astronomers have taught us to conceive it) from which the five stars could be said to form a double-u. Move the observer a few light-years to the right or the left, the double-u would disappear. Move the ob\nserver 50 light-years forward, and he or she could construct only a triangle with the three stars that remained in front.","category":"Beispiel3","data_creacio":1566400506067°
|