Annotation:Text:Knowing without Metaphysics: Aspects of the Radical Constructivist Position/E618ch309z

From DigiVis
< Annotation:Text:Knowing without Metaphysics: Aspects of the Radical Constructivist Position
Revision as of 10:11, 2 July 2019 by Sarah Oberbichler (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Argumentation2}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Text:Knowing_without_Metaphysics:_Aspects_of_the_Radical_Constructivist_Position |LastModificationDate=2019-07-02T11:11:50.90...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Annotation of Text:Knowing_without_Metaphysics:_Aspects_of_the_Radical_Constructivist_Position
Annotation Comment
Last Modification Date 2019-07-02T11:11:50.903Z
Last Modification User User:Sarah Oberbichler
Annotation Metadata
^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"E618ch309z","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ31Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ33Ӻ","endOffset":754°Ӻ,"quote":"Two aspects of this development are crucial for an understanding of Radical Constructivism. First, all this distinguishing and constructing of one’s ‘self’ takes place within the experiential field, uses elements of the sensory manifold, and is the result of the experiencer’s own actions. It does not require ‘things-in-themselves’ or ‘distinctions-in-themselves’ that could be ascribed to an objective, ontological reality. Second, what is isolated and established in this way, is the self one experiences – it is not that mysterious central entity that does the experiencing.\nThe constructs with which we have furnished our experiential world are those we have found useful or, at least, tenable. We use them in our schemes of action and in our conceptual operations; we drop or modify them if their rate of failure gets too high and we are able to construct more reliable ones; and we try to balance and coordinate them among each other. The more generally they are applicable, the less of them we need.\nAnd, given the variety of situations we come to distinguish, economy in the number of schemes becomes an important consideration.\nIn all this there is an aspect that was clearly stated by Piaget but was mostly ignored or misunderstood by both his followers and his critics. The experiential environment in which an individual’s constructs and schemes must prove viable is always a social environment as well as a physical one. Though one’s concepts, one’s ways of operating, and one’s knowledge cannot be constructed by any other subject than oneself, it is their viability, their adequate functioning in one’s physical and social environment, that furnishes the key to the solidification of the individual’s experiential reality (von Glasersfeld, 1985).","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321088642118244914892":^°°,^"jQuery321088642118244914892":^°°,^"jQuery321088642118244914892":^°°,^"jQuery321088642118244914892":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Argumentation2","data_creacio":1562058710455°
Thema Realität
Thema Viabilität