Annotation:Text:Piaget’s Legacy: Cognition as Adaptive Activity/Yoeezfupix

From DigiVis
< Annotation:Text:Piaget’s Legacy: Cognition as Adaptive Activity
Revision as of 13:33, 26 July 2019 by Sarah Oberbichler (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Annotation of Text:Piaget’s_Legacy:_Cognition_as_Adaptive_Activity
Annotation Comment
Last Modification Date 2019-07-26T14:33:09.127Z
Last Modification User User:Sarah Oberbichler
Annotation Metadata
^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Yoeezfupix","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ43Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ45Ӻ","endOffset":389°Ӻ,"quote":"The experiential environment in which the human organism normally grows up is composed of things and people. The differentiation of these two categories is gradual, and only gradually are different schemes developed for coping with “inanimate” things and coping with people. Eventually the second kind provides far more opportunities for accommodation and learning than the first. Piaget has reiterated this innumerable times, but his critics nevertheless contend that he did not consider social interaction.\nIn fact, the experiential reality we construct for ourselves is to a large extent the result of our social interactions. Insofar as we are able to construct a viable modus vivendi, it is preponderantly due to accommodations in the course of social adaptation. \nIn order to live in a society, a sufficient number of our ideas — our concepts and schemes of action — have to be compatible with those of others. And this compatibility confers on them a viability that goes beyond the merely individual. The same goes for the acquisition and use of language. Communication with others requires that the meanings we attribute to words prove compatible with those of other speakers.\nCompatibility, however, does not entail the kind of “match” that is implied when people speak of “shared ideas” or “shared knowledge”. Compatibility, to repeat it once more, means no more and no less than to fit within constraints. Consequently, it seems to me that one of the most demanding tasks of A.I. would be the plausible simulation of an organism’s experience of social constraints","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321091777439976599082":^°°,^"jQuery321091777439976599082":^°°,^"jQuery321091777439976599082":^°°,^"jQuery321091777439976599082":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","category":"Argumentation2","data_creacio":1564144361091°
Thema Viabilität
Thema Sprache
Thema Anpassung