Annotation:Annotationen:Teleology and the Concepts of Causation/O5qmocckw2

From DigiVis
< Annotation:Annotationen:Teleology and the Concepts of Causation
Revision as of 20:04, 17 January 2020 by Sarah Oberbichler (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Prämisse3}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Annotationen:Teleology_and_the_Concepts_of_Causation |LastModificationDate=2020-01-17T19:04:58.093Z |LastModificationUser=User:Sa...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Annotation of Annotationen:Teleology_and_the_Concepts_of_Causation
Annotation Comment
Last Modification Date 2020-01-17T19:04:58.093Z
Last Modification User User:Sarah Oberbichler
Annotation Metadata
^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"O5qmocckw2","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ12Ӻ","startOffset":14,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ12Ӻ/pӶ1Ӻ","endOffset":321°Ӻ,"quote":"But this means that there must be something in the organism that decides whether an action does or does not ‘work’. This assessment may be as automatic and unconscious as it is with the rat that avoids electric shock or the toddler who stays away from the hot stove; but, conscious or not, there is something that decides that actions which lead to shocks or burning sensations do not ‘work’ and, consequently, should not be repeated. \nTo my mind, this way of analysing behavior is illuminating because it brings out the governing principle of induction. But it is incomplete because it persistently avoids mentioning that in order to answer the question what works, one needs a notion of value, no matter how elementary or unconscious that notion might be.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery3210881436949605492":^°°,^"jQuery3210881436949605492":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Prämisse3","data_creacio":1579284297816°