Annotation:Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking

From DigiVis
Jump to: navigation, search

This Page shows all Annotations of the Article Annotationen:The_Reluctance_to_Change_a_Way_of_Thinking.

Annotations

AnnotationAnnotationCommentLastModificationUserLastModificationDateCategory
Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/Cjp7hddniySarah Oberbichler27 January 2020 18:23:09TextAnnotation
Prämisse3
Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/Ef3tssha25What we call “knowledge”, then, is the map of paths of action and thought which, at that moment in the course of our experience, have turned out to be viable for us.Sarah Oberbichler27 January 2020 17:41:16TextAnnotation
Schlussfolgerung3
Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/Er0iabn9hcWithout going into the details of the process that links the experience of a thing with the experience of a word, it should be clear that both these items are composed of elements that are part of the acting subject’s experiential world and are, therefore, determined by what the subject attends to and how the subject perceives and conceives it.Sarah Oberbichler27 January 2020 18:30:53TextAnnotation
Schlussfolgerung3
Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/Fy4315bj08That is to say, the proponents of a theory will assimilate new experiences as long as they possibly can, even in the face of considerable perturbations.Sarah Oberbichler27 January 2020 16:15:01TextAnnotation
Schlussfolgerung3
Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/Ggfynwin3dTo be adapted, therefore, means no more and no less than to be viable.Sarah Oberbichler27 January 2020 18:23:00TextAnnotation
Schlussfolgerung3
Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/Iar0damzs0Sarah Oberbichler27 January 2020 18:27:10TextAnnotation
Prämisse3
Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/JilmbioysqSarah Oberbichler27 January 2020 19:31:07TextAnnotation
Schlussfolgerung3
Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/KmtzjqdbphSarah Oberbichler27 January 2020 19:30:53TextAnnotation
Prämisse3
Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/Mdk3s7g2eqIn fact, the process of accommodation and adaptation of the meaning of words and linguistic expressions continues for each of us throughout our lives, and no matter how long we have spoken the language, there will still be occasions when we experience a perturbation and realize that we have been using a word in a way that turns out to be idiosyncratic in some particular respect.Sarah Oberbichler27 January 2020 18:33:43TextAnnotation
Schlussfolgerung3
Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/MkwgldjnzqFinally, it must be made clear that, while biologists may tend to think of viability and adaptedness in terms of differential reproduction, in the cognitive domain the two terms refer to the achievement and maintenance of internal equilibrium. For the constructivist, therefore, Knowledge has the function of eliminating perturbations; and the higher we move in the hierarchy of conceptual abstractions, the more the perturbations tend to be conceptual rather than material. This, obviously, is one of the features that make the constructivist approach interesting for therapists.Sarah Oberbichler27 January 2020 18:25:27TextAnnotation
Schlussfolgerung3
Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/O4xnxyeby8Sarah Oberbichler27 January 2020 16:15:48TextAnnotation
Prämisse3
Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/Onvo8k214nSolutions, from the constructivist perspective, are always relative — and this, in turn, makes clear that problems are not entities that lie about in the universe, independent of any experiencer. Instead, problems arise when obstacles block the way to a subject’s goal.Sarah Oberbichler27 January 2020 18:27:00TextAnnotation
Schlussfolgerung3
Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/Pp2o1bfp77When the nail that holds up the wire to my computer falls out of the wall in my study and I use my shoe to hammer it in again, I am deliberately assimilating the shoe to the function of a hammer. It may work, or it may not, but even if it does work I am not led to believe that the shoe is a hammer. In contrast, a child that has just begun to associate two or three visual characteristics, such as four legs, a tail, and fur, with utterances of the word “dog”, may well utter that word when a new visual experience allows her to see these three characteristics. A psychologist who witnesses this, may smile and say: “Ah, you see, she assimilates the lamb to her concept of dog!” He will be quite right, of course, in making this assessment; but he will be wrong if he believes that the child’s utterance requires some special activity that is called “assimilation”. From the child’s point of view, given her criteria for using the word “dog”, the lamb is a dog, and she has no reason to modify her categorization until some unexpected event creates a perturbation. Only when the new item behaves in a way that seems undog-like to her, or when someone says “No, dear, this is a lamb”, will the child have occasion to accommodate, i.e., to look for a distinguishing characteristic and, if one can be found, to create a new conceptual category called “lamb”.Sarah Oberbichler27 January 2020 16:15:37TextAnnotation
Beispiel3
Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/Ut6e3qcx0cSarah Oberbichler27 January 2020 17:41:28TextAnnotation
Prämisse3
Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/Vydb681ckoSarah Oberbichler27 January 2020 18:30:39TextAnnotation
Prämisse3
Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/Z68fuipj6pSarah Oberbichler27 January 2020 18:33:53TextAnnotation
Prämisse3
Annotationen:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/Zq5wuk01z0Sarah Oberbichler27 January 2020 18:25:42TextAnnotation
Prämisse3