Difference between revisions of "Annotation:Text:An Introduction to Radical Constructivism/Abjlkt9sx6"

From DigiVis
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{Innovationsdiskurs2}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Text:An_Introduction_to_Radical_Constructivism |LastModificationDate=2019-06-03T19:39:06.449Z |LastModificationUser=User...")
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
{{TextAnnotation
 
{{TextAnnotation
 
|AnnotationOf=Text:An_Introduction_to_Radical_Constructivism
 
|AnnotationOf=Text:An_Introduction_to_Radical_Constructivism
|LastModificationDate=2019-06-03T19:39:06.449Z
+
|LastModificationDate=2019-06-03T19:50:30.224Z
 
|LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler
 
|LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler
|AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Abjlkt9sx6","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ3Ӻ","startOffset":1054,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ3Ӻ","endOffset":1587°Ӻ,"quote":"Indeed, one need not enter very far into constructivist thought to realize that it inevitably leads to the contention that man – and man alone – is responsible for his thinking, his knowledge and, therefore, also for what he does. Today, when behaviorists are still intent on pushing all responsibility into the environment, and sociobiologists are trying to place much of it into genes, a doctrine may well seem uncomfortable if it suggests that we have no one but ourselves to thank for the world in which we appear to be living.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321023676176873103662":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Innovationsdiskurs2","data_creacio":1559583546105°
+
|AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Abjlkt9sx6","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ3Ӻ","startOffset":1054,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ3Ӻ","endOffset":1587°Ӻ,"quote":"Indeed, one need not enter very far into constructivist thought to realize that it inevitably leads to the contention that man – and man alone – is responsible for his thinking, his knowledge and, therefore, also for what he does. Today, when behaviorists are still intent on pushing all responsibility into the environment, and sociobiologists are trying to place much of it into genes, a doctrine may well seem uncomfortable if it suggests that we have no one but ourselves to thank for the world in which we appear to be living.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321023676176873103662":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","category":"Innovationsdiskurs2","data_creacio":1559583546105°
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Innovationstyp
 
{{Innovationstyp
|field_text_autocomplete=Schockierende Erkenntnisse
+
|field_text_autocomplete=Schock
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 19:50, 3 June 2019

Annotation of Text:An_Introduction_to_Radical_Constructivism
Annotation Comment
Last Modification Date 2019-06-03T19:50:30.224Z
Last Modification User User:Sarah Oberbichler
Annotation Metadata
^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Abjlkt9sx6","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ3Ӻ","startOffset":1054,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ3Ӻ","endOffset":1587°Ӻ,"quote":"Indeed, one need not enter very far into constructivist thought to realize that it inevitably leads to the contention that man – and man alone – is responsible for his thinking, his knowledge and, therefore, also for what he does. Today, when behaviorists are still intent on pushing all responsibility into the environment, and sociobiologists are trying to place much of it into genes, a doctrine may well seem uncomfortable if it suggests that we have no one but ourselves to thank for the world in which we appear to be living.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321023676176873103662":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","category":"Innovationsdiskurs2","data_creacio":1559583546105°
Innovationstyp Schock