Annotation:Text:Distinguishing the Observer: An Attempt at Interpreting Maturana/Erwi3uolxv

From DigiVis
Jump to: navigation, search
Referenztyp: Theorie
Annotation of Text:Distinguishing_the_Observer:_An_Attempt_at_Interpreting_Maturana
Annotation Comment
Last Modification Date 2019-09-27T17:39:30.442Z
Last Modification User User:Sarah Oberbichler
Annotation Metadata
^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Erwi3uolxv","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ14Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/blockquoteӶ3Ӻ/pӶ1Ӻ","endOffset":394°Ӻ,"quote":"In “The Bringing forth of Pathology”, an article Maturana recently wrote together with Carmen Luz Mendez and Fernando Coddou, there is a section about language and the various forms of conversation. Two of these forms are described in some detail:\n\nThe first we shall call conversations of characterisation if they entail expectations that have not been agreed upon about the characteristics of the participants. The second we shall call conversations of unjustified accusations and recriminations if they entail complaints about unfulfilled expectations about the behaviors of the participants that were not previously agreed upon.Ӷ8Ӻ (p.155)","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery3210133245403116930342":^°°,^"jQuery3210133245403116930342":^°°,^"jQuery3210133245403116930342":^°°,^"jQuery3210133245403116930342":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"WissenschaftlicheReferenz2","data_creacio":1569598768926°