| Annotation Metadata
|
^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Ah27e703oo","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ5Ӻ","startOffset":357,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ5Ӻ","endOffset":1285°Ӻ,"quote":"The skeptics argue that what we come to know\nhas gone through our sensory system and through our conceptual system and it gives\nus a picture. But when we would like to know whether this is a correct picture, a true\npicture of an outside world, we are completely stuck, because every time we look at the\noutside world, what we see is again seen through our sensory system and through our\nconceptual system.\nSo we are trapped in a paradox. We want to believe that we can know something\nof the outside world, but we can never tell whether this knowledge is true. Because to\nestablish such truth would require a comparison which we simply cannot make. We\nErnst von Glasersfeld (1991) The Construction of Knowledge\nhave no way of getting at the outside world, except by experiencing it. And in\nexperiencing it, we may be making the same mistakes; even if we saw it all correctly,\nwe would have no way of knowing that it is correct.3","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321061453010698174142":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","category":"Argumentation2","data_creacio":1562090837528°
|
