| Annotation Metadata
|
^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Hibim3678s","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ7Ӻ","startOffset":1530,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ7Ӻ","endOffset":2333°Ӻ,"quote":"They\ncan decode the message because they already know the code. But how should we\ndecode the signals that we get from our sensors, the signals that, according to the\ntraditional view, are coming from the outside world? We do not know who or what\nencoded them in that hypothetical outside world, nor do we know the code. We can\nonly look at the signals from the inside, namely from the receiver’s side. Hence the use\nof the term information makes no sense in this context. We can speak of “information”\nrelative to our own experiences, but never with regard to anything that is supposed to\nlie beyond our experiential interface.\nProfessor Prigogine said, if I understood him rightly, “Knowledge is\nparticipation”.8 As you can tell from what I have said, I go further and say:\n“Knowledge is construction.”","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321063015001792033722":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","category":"Argumentation2","data_creacio":1562093625650°
|
