| Annotation Metadata
|
^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Wetfd1kom4","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ7Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ7Ӻ","endOffset":1530°Ӻ,"quote":"The last root of Constructivism is Cybernetics. This relatively new branch of studies\nfocused much interest on self-regulation and self-organizing organisms.\nIt seems to me that a serious study of Self-Regulation must come to the point\nwhere it asks also about the activity of knowing, and whether knowing is not also a\nresult of self-regulation. Once again, a very simple statement. It means that whatever\nyou call knowledge must be made-up or constructed out of material that is accessible\nto the knower. In fact, it is the cybernetician’s way of formulating what Vico said;\nnamely, that you can only know what you yourself have made. And to make it yourself,\nyou must have access to the building blocks, to the raw material. Cybernetics then\nhelps to unravel the question of what is accessible and what not.\nFrom the Cybernetic point of view, self-regulating systems are informationally\nclosed. To explain this, we must remember what Claude Shannon, in his famous paper\non the Theory of Communication,7 showed about signals and their meaning. Two of\nhis points are sufficient to clear up the wide-spread misconception of the term\n“information”:\n(1) meaning does not travel from the sender to the receiver – the only thing that\ntravels are signals;\n(2) signals are signals only insofar as someone can decode them, and in order to\ndecode them you have to know their meaning.\nCommunication, therefore, works when two people send each other a telegram\nand they have previously established a code outside that communication system.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321063015001792033722":^°°,^"jQuery321063015001792033722":^°°,^"jQuery321063015001792033722":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","category":"Argumentation2","data_creacio":1562093563255°
|
