| Annotation Metadata
|
^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Yxakzeprgt","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ4Ӻ","startOffset":1528,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ4Ӻ","endOffset":2219°Ӻ,"quote":"In retrospect, I believe it was this circumstance that drove me into philosophy\nand was the primary source of my interest in theories of knowledge. I read philosophy\neclectically and without supervision. This has a disadvantage. Having no professional\nguidance, it may take you many years to solve a problem, and then you discover that\nyou could have found the solution in a book, if only someone had told you where to\nlook. On the other hand, eclectic reading has the advantage that you read some\nauthors that are never mentioned in standard philosophy courses. And in my case\nsome of these authors happened to be particularly important for constructing a\nconstructivist theory of knowing.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321092448321330961882":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Narrativ","data_creacio":1548691843256°
|
