Editing Annotation:Text:Teleology and the Concepts of Causation/Tkjbd419fp

{{Innovationsdiskurs2}}
{{TextAnnotation
|AnnotationOf=Text:Teleology_and_the_Concepts_of_Causation
|LastModificationDate=2019-12-11T12:39:37.603Z
|LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler
|AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Tkjbd419fp","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ5Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ5Ӻ","endOffset":716°Ӻ,"quote":"To this influence of the history of physics on the Western way of thinking, one must add the thrust of the behaviorist doctrine in this century. Skinner’s campaign succeeded to an extraordinary extent in excluding from the scientific domain not only human mind and meaning, but also all manifestations of intelligence in animals. Living organisms were to be squeezed into the Newtonian clockwork image of the world (in spite of the fact that theoretical physics had already moved beyond that conception). Consequently, the powerful establishment of behaviorist psychology branded intention, purpose, and goal-directedness as dirty words, and did its best to expurgate them as relatives of the concept of final cause.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321096051066034122692":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","category":"Innovationsdiskurs2","data_creacio":1576064349617°
}}
{{Innovationstyp
|field_text_autocomplete=Infragestellen der traditionellen Erkenntnistheorie
}}