Editing Annotation:The Concepts of Adaptation and Viability in a Radical Constructivist Theory of Knowledge/Vpw40ehrp3

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

This page supports semantic in-text annotations (e.g. "[[Is specified as::World Heritage Site]]") to build structured and queryable content provided by Semantic MediaWiki. For a comprehensive description on how to use annotations or the #ask parser function, please have a look at the getting started, in-text annotation, or inline queries help pages.

Latest revision Your text
Line 11: Line 11:
 
{{TextAnnotation
 
{{TextAnnotation
 
|AnnotationOf=The_Concepts_of_Adaptation_and_Viability_in_a_Radical_Constructivist_Theory_of_Knowledge
 
|AnnotationOf=The_Concepts_of_Adaptation_and_Viability_in_a_Radical_Constructivist_Theory_of_Knowledge
|AnnotationComment=Der einzige Hinweis auf die "reale" Struktur der Umwelt können wir durch Organismen erhalten, die nicht überleben. Die Überlebenden stellen lediglich eine Auswahl an undendlichen Lösungen dar, die ebenfalls lebensfähig sein könnten.
+
|AnnotationComment=Der einzige Hinweis auf die "reale" Struktur der Umwelt können wir durch Organismen erhlalten, die nicht überlegen. Die Überlebenden stellen lediglich eine Auswahl an undendlichen Lösungen dar, die ebenfalls lebensfähig sein könnten.
|LastModificationDate=2019-03-29T18:21:22.063Z
+
|LastModificationDate=2019-03-29T18:19:45.352Z
 
|LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler
 
|LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler
|AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Vpw40ehrp3","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ11Ӻ","startOffset":1185,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ11Ӻ","endOffset":3078°Ӻ,"quote":"The environment does not determine how that might he achieved. It does not cause certain organisms to have certain characteristics or capabilities or to be a certain way. The environment merely eliminates those organisms that knock against its constraints. Anyone who by any means manages to get by the constraints, survives. We all should know that, from looking around us. If one looks around in Athens, Georgia, one can see cardinals and cockroaches, humming birds, bats, chipmunks, and snakes; daddy longlegs, opossums, frogs, and catfish; and a seemingly infinite variety of mushrooms, moulds, butterflies, and worms. All of them survive in that environment and they have found entirely different solutions for survival. For all we know, there is an infinite variety of solutions for survival, an infinite number of ways of being viable. Tomorrow, if the environment should change, some of today’s organisms may no longer be viable, others may make it in spite of the change. In the ordinary way of speaking we would say that those organisms that survive the change have or are adapted to the new environment. This again invites the conceptual error mentioned before, since it suggests that the change in the environment has caused specific corresponding changes in the organisms. But that is not the case. Organisms may indeed change, but the changes they manifest are due to their inherent variability, their mutations, genetic drift, or what you will. All the environment contributes is constraints that knock out some of the changed organisms while others are left to survive. Thus we can say that the only indication we may get of the \"real\" structure of the environment is through the organisms and the species that have been extinguished; the viable ones that survive merely constitute a selection of solutions among an infinity of potential solutions that might be equally viable.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321050088968346891672":^°°,^"jQuery321050088968346891672":^°°,^"jQuery321050088968346891672":^°°,^"jQuery321050088968346891672":^°°,^"jQuery321050088968346891672":^°°,^"jQuery321050088968346891672":^°°Ӻ,"text":"Der einzige Hinweis auf die \"reale\" Struktur der Umwelt können wir durch Organismen erhalten, die nicht überleben. Die Überlebenden stellen lediglich eine Auswahl an undendlichen Lösungen dar, die ebenfalls lebensfähig sein könnten. ","category":"Argument","data_creacio":1553879982883°
+
|AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Vpw40ehrp3","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ11Ӻ","startOffset":1185,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ11Ӻ","endOffset":3078°Ӻ,"quote":"The environment does not determine how that might he achieved. It does not cause certain organisms to have certain characteristics or capabilities or to be a certain way. The environment merely eliminates those organisms that knock against its constraints. Anyone who by any means manages to get by the constraints, survives. We all should know that, from looking around us. If one looks around in Athens, Georgia, one can see cardinals and cockroaches, humming birds, bats, chipmunks, and snakes; daddy longlegs, opossums, frogs, and catfish; and a seemingly infinite variety of mushrooms, moulds, butterflies, and worms. All of them survive in that environment and they have found entirely different solutions for survival. For all we know, there is an infinite variety of solutions for survival, an infinite number of ways of being viable. Tomorrow, if the environment should change, some of today’s organisms may no longer be viable, others may make it in spite of the change. In the ordinary way of speaking we would say that those organisms that survive the change have or are adapted to the new environment. This again invites the conceptual error mentioned before, since it suggests that the change in the environment has caused specific corresponding changes in the organisms. But that is not the case. Organisms may indeed change, but the changes they manifest are due to their inherent variability, their mutations, genetic drift, or what you will. All the environment contributes is constraints that knock out some of the changed organisms while others are left to survive. Thus we can say that the only indication we may get of the \"real\" structure of the environment is through the organisms and the species that have been extinguished; the viable ones that survive merely constitute a selection of solutions among an infinity of potential solutions that might be equally viable.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321050088968346891672":^°°,^"jQuery321050088968346891672":^°°,^"jQuery321050088968346891672":^°°,^"jQuery321050088968346891672":^°°,^"jQuery321050088968346891672":^°°,^"jQuery321050088968346891672":^°°Ӻ,"text":"Der einzige Hinweis auf die \"reale\" Struktur der Umwelt können wir durch Organismen erhlalten, die nicht überlegen. Die Überlebenden stellen lediglich eine Auswahl an undendlichen Lösungen dar, die ebenfalls lebensfähig sein könnten. ","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Argument","data_creacio":1553879982883°
 
}}
 
}}

Please note that all contributions to DigiVis are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (see DigiVis:Copyrights for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource. Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)