<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://dbis-digivis.uibk.ac.at/mediawiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Annotation%3AAn_Introduction_to_Radical_Constructivism%2FUl5vmn52ua</id>
	<title>Annotation:An Introduction to Radical Constructivism/Ul5vmn52ua - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://dbis-digivis.uibk.ac.at/mediawiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Annotation%3AAn_Introduction_to_Radical_Constructivism%2FUl5vmn52ua"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://dbis-digivis.uibk.ac.at/mediawiki/index.php?title=Annotation:An_Introduction_to_Radical_Constructivism/Ul5vmn52ua&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-15T11:02:02Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.31.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://dbis-digivis.uibk.ac.at/mediawiki/index.php?title=Annotation:An_Introduction_to_Radical_Constructivism/Ul5vmn52ua&amp;diff=1346&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Admin at 14:36, 23 April 2019</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://dbis-digivis.uibk.ac.at/mediawiki/index.php?title=Annotation:An_Introduction_to_Radical_Constructivism/Ul5vmn52ua&amp;diff=1346&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2019-04-23T14:36:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table class=&quot;diff diff-contentalign-left&quot; data-mw=&quot;interface&quot;&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-marker&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;col class=&quot;diff-content&quot; /&gt;
				&lt;tr class=&quot;diff-title&quot; lang=&quot;en&quot;&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #222; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; style=&quot;background-color: #fff; color: #222; text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 14:36, 23 April 2019&lt;/td&gt;
				&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot; id=&quot;mw-diff-left-l5&quot; &gt;Line 5:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 5:&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;|LastModificationDate=2019-02-26T10:49:31.246Z&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;|LastModificationDate=2019-02-26T10:49:31.246Z&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;|LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;|LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;−&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;|AnnotationMetadata=^&amp;quot;permissions&amp;quot;:^&amp;quot;read&amp;quot;:ӶӺ,&amp;quot;update&amp;quot;:ӶӺ,&amp;quot;delete&amp;quot;:ӶӺ,&amp;quot;admin&amp;quot;:ӶӺ°,&amp;quot;user&amp;quot;:^&amp;quot;id&amp;quot;:6,&amp;quot;name&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;Sarah Oberbichler&amp;quot;°,&amp;quot;id&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;Ul5vmn52ua&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;ranges&amp;quot;:Ӷ^&amp;quot;start&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/&lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;pӶ35Ӻ&lt;/del&gt;&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;startOffset&amp;quot;:0,&amp;quot;end&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/&lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;pӶ35Ӻ&lt;/del&gt;&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;endOffset&amp;quot;:678°Ӻ,&amp;quot;quote&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;In traditional theories of knowledge, the activity of “knowing” is taken as a matter of course, an activity that requires no justification and functions as an initial constituent. The knowing subject is conceived of as a “pure” entity in the sense that it is essentially unimpeded by biological or psychological conditions. The radical constructivist epistemology quite deliberately breaks that conventional framework and commits what professional philosophers, more or less disparagingly, dismiss as “psychologism.” The deliberations that have led me to this somewhat iconoclastic step derive from what was said in the first two sections as soon as one considers them jointly.&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;highlights&amp;quot;:Ӷ^&amp;quot;jQuery321054842665956511262&amp;quot;:^°°Ӻ,&amp;quot;text&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;Ablösen klassischer Denkweisen&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;order&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;mw-content-text&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;category&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;Rethorische Figur&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;data_creacio&amp;quot;:1551174570911°&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;|AnnotationMetadata=^&amp;quot;permissions&amp;quot;:^&amp;quot;read&amp;quot;:ӶӺ,&amp;quot;update&amp;quot;:ӶӺ,&amp;quot;delete&amp;quot;:ӶӺ,&amp;quot;admin&amp;quot;:ӶӺ°,&amp;quot;user&amp;quot;:^&amp;quot;id&amp;quot;:6,&amp;quot;name&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;Sarah Oberbichler&amp;quot;°,&amp;quot;id&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;Ul5vmn52ua&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;ranges&amp;quot;:Ӷ^&amp;quot;start&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/&lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;pӶ33Ӻ&lt;/ins&gt;&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;startOffset&amp;quot;:0,&amp;quot;end&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/&lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;pӶ33Ӻ&lt;/ins&gt;&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;endOffset&amp;quot;:678°Ӻ,&amp;quot;quote&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;In traditional theories of knowledge, the activity of “knowing” is taken as a matter of course, an activity that requires no justification and functions as an initial constituent. The knowing subject is conceived of as a “pure” entity in the sense that it is essentially unimpeded by biological or psychological conditions. The radical constructivist epistemology quite deliberately breaks that conventional framework and commits what professional philosophers, more or less disparagingly, dismiss as “psychologism.” The deliberations that have led me to this somewhat iconoclastic step derive from what was said in the first two sections as soon as one considers them jointly.&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;highlights&amp;quot;:Ӷ^&amp;quot;jQuery321054842665956511262&amp;quot;:^°°Ӻ,&amp;quot;text&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;Ablösen klassischer Denkweisen&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;order&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;mw-content-text&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;category&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;Rethorische Figur&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;data_creacio&amp;quot;:1551174570911°&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;|AnnotationOf=An_Introduction_to_Radical_Constructivism&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;|AnnotationOf=An_Introduction_to_Radical_Constructivism&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;|AnnotationComment=Ablösen klassischer Denkweisen&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;|AnnotationComment=Ablösen klassischer Denkweisen&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;|LastModificationDate=2019-02-26T10:49:31.246Z&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;|LastModificationDate=2019-02-26T10:49:31.246Z&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;|LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;|LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;−&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;|AnnotationMetadata=^&amp;quot;permissions&amp;quot;:^&amp;quot;read&amp;quot;:ӶӺ,&amp;quot;update&amp;quot;:ӶӺ,&amp;quot;delete&amp;quot;:ӶӺ,&amp;quot;admin&amp;quot;:ӶӺ°,&amp;quot;user&amp;quot;:^&amp;quot;id&amp;quot;:6,&amp;quot;name&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;Sarah Oberbichler&amp;quot;°,&amp;quot;id&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;Ul5vmn52ua&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;ranges&amp;quot;:Ӷ^&amp;quot;start&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/&lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;pӶ35Ӻ&lt;/del&gt;&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;startOffset&amp;quot;:0,&amp;quot;end&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/&lt;del class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;pӶ35Ӻ&lt;/del&gt;&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;endOffset&amp;quot;:678°Ӻ,&amp;quot;quote&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;In traditional theories of knowledge, the activity of “knowing” is taken as a matter of course, an activity that requires no justification and functions as an initial constituent. The knowing subject is conceived of as a “pure” entity in the sense that it is essentially unimpeded by biological or psychological conditions. The radical constructivist epistemology quite deliberately breaks that conventional framework and commits what professional philosophers, more or less disparagingly, dismiss as “psychologism.” The deliberations that have led me to this somewhat iconoclastic step derive from what was said in the first two sections as soon as one considers them jointly.&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;highlights&amp;quot;:Ӷ^&amp;quot;jQuery321054842665956511262&amp;quot;:^°°Ӻ,&amp;quot;text&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;Ablösen klassischer Denkweisen&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;order&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;mw-content-text&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;category&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;Rethorische Figur&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;data_creacio&amp;quot;:1551174570911°&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;|AnnotationMetadata=^&amp;quot;permissions&amp;quot;:^&amp;quot;read&amp;quot;:ӶӺ,&amp;quot;update&amp;quot;:ӶӺ,&amp;quot;delete&amp;quot;:ӶӺ,&amp;quot;admin&amp;quot;:ӶӺ°,&amp;quot;user&amp;quot;:^&amp;quot;id&amp;quot;:6,&amp;quot;name&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;Sarah Oberbichler&amp;quot;°,&amp;quot;id&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;Ul5vmn52ua&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;ranges&amp;quot;:Ӷ^&amp;quot;start&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/&lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;pӶ33Ӻ&lt;/ins&gt;&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;startOffset&amp;quot;:0,&amp;quot;end&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/&lt;ins class=&quot;diffchange diffchange-inline&quot;&gt;pӶ33Ӻ&lt;/ins&gt;&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;endOffset&amp;quot;:678°Ӻ,&amp;quot;quote&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;In traditional theories of knowledge, the activity of “knowing” is taken as a matter of course, an activity that requires no justification and functions as an initial constituent. The knowing subject is conceived of as a “pure” entity in the sense that it is essentially unimpeded by biological or psychological conditions. The radical constructivist epistemology quite deliberately breaks that conventional framework and commits what professional philosophers, more or less disparagingly, dismiss as “psychologism.” The deliberations that have led me to this somewhat iconoclastic step derive from what was said in the first two sections as soon as one considers them jointly.&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;highlights&amp;quot;:Ӷ^&amp;quot;jQuery321054842665956511262&amp;quot;:^°°Ӻ,&amp;quot;text&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;Ablösen klassischer Denkweisen&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;order&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;mw-content-text&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;category&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;Rethorische Figur&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;data_creacio&amp;quot;:1551174570911°&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;}}&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;}}&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{TextAnnotation}}&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background-color: #f8f9fa; color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #eaecf0; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{TextAnnotation}}&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Admin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://dbis-digivis.uibk.ac.at/mediawiki/index.php?title=Annotation:An_Introduction_to_Radical_Constructivism/Ul5vmn52ua&amp;diff=509&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Sarah Oberbichler: Created page with &quot;{{RhetorischeFigur}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=An_Introduction_to_Radical_Constructivism |AnnotationComment=Ablösen klassischer Denkweisen |LastModificationDate=2019-02-...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://dbis-digivis.uibk.ac.at/mediawiki/index.php?title=Annotation:An_Introduction_to_Radical_Constructivism/Ul5vmn52ua&amp;diff=509&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2019-02-26T09:49:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;{{RhetorischeFigur}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=An_Introduction_to_Radical_Constructivism |AnnotationComment=Ablösen klassischer Denkweisen |LastModificationDate=2019-02-...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{RhetorischeFigur}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{TextAnnotation&lt;br /&gt;
|AnnotationOf=An_Introduction_to_Radical_Constructivism&lt;br /&gt;
|AnnotationComment=Ablösen klassischer Denkweisen&lt;br /&gt;
|LastModificationDate=2019-02-26T10:49:31.246Z&lt;br /&gt;
|LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler&lt;br /&gt;
|AnnotationMetadata=^&amp;quot;permissions&amp;quot;:^&amp;quot;read&amp;quot;:ӶӺ,&amp;quot;update&amp;quot;:ӶӺ,&amp;quot;delete&amp;quot;:ӶӺ,&amp;quot;admin&amp;quot;:ӶӺ°,&amp;quot;user&amp;quot;:^&amp;quot;id&amp;quot;:6,&amp;quot;name&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;Sarah Oberbichler&amp;quot;°,&amp;quot;id&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;Ul5vmn52ua&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;ranges&amp;quot;:Ӷ^&amp;quot;start&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ35Ӻ&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;startOffset&amp;quot;:0,&amp;quot;end&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ35Ӻ&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;endOffset&amp;quot;:678°Ӻ,&amp;quot;quote&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;In traditional theories of knowledge, the activity of “knowing” is taken as a matter of course, an activity that requires no justification and functions as an initial constituent. The knowing subject is conceived of as a “pure” entity in the sense that it is essentially unimpeded by biological or psychological conditions. The radical constructivist epistemology quite deliberately breaks that conventional framework and commits what professional philosophers, more or less disparagingly, dismiss as “psychologism.” The deliberations that have led me to this somewhat iconoclastic step derive from what was said in the first two sections as soon as one considers them jointly.&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;highlights&amp;quot;:Ӷ^&amp;quot;jQuery321054842665956511262&amp;quot;:^°°Ӻ,&amp;quot;text&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;Ablösen klassischer Denkweisen&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;order&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;mw-content-text&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;category&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;Rethorische Figur&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;data_creacio&amp;quot;:1551174570911°&lt;br /&gt;
|AnnotationOf=An_Introduction_to_Radical_Constructivism&lt;br /&gt;
|AnnotationComment=Ablösen klassischer Denkweisen&lt;br /&gt;
|LastModificationDate=2019-02-26T10:49:31.246Z&lt;br /&gt;
|LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler&lt;br /&gt;
|AnnotationMetadata=^&amp;quot;permissions&amp;quot;:^&amp;quot;read&amp;quot;:ӶӺ,&amp;quot;update&amp;quot;:ӶӺ,&amp;quot;delete&amp;quot;:ӶӺ,&amp;quot;admin&amp;quot;:ӶӺ°,&amp;quot;user&amp;quot;:^&amp;quot;id&amp;quot;:6,&amp;quot;name&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;Sarah Oberbichler&amp;quot;°,&amp;quot;id&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;Ul5vmn52ua&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;ranges&amp;quot;:Ӷ^&amp;quot;start&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ35Ӻ&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;startOffset&amp;quot;:0,&amp;quot;end&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ35Ӻ&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;endOffset&amp;quot;:678°Ӻ,&amp;quot;quote&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;In traditional theories of knowledge, the activity of “knowing” is taken as a matter of course, an activity that requires no justification and functions as an initial constituent. The knowing subject is conceived of as a “pure” entity in the sense that it is essentially unimpeded by biological or psychological conditions. The radical constructivist epistemology quite deliberately breaks that conventional framework and commits what professional philosophers, more or less disparagingly, dismiss as “psychologism.” The deliberations that have led me to this somewhat iconoclastic step derive from what was said in the first two sections as soon as one considers them jointly.&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;highlights&amp;quot;:Ӷ^&amp;quot;jQuery321054842665956511262&amp;quot;:^°°Ӻ,&amp;quot;text&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;Ablösen klassischer Denkweisen&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;order&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;mw-content-text&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;category&amp;quot;:&amp;quot;Rethorische Figur&amp;quot;,&amp;quot;data_creacio&amp;quot;:1551174570911°&lt;br /&gt;
}}&lt;br /&gt;
{{TextAnnotation}}&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Sarah Oberbichler</name></author>
		
	</entry>
</feed>