Annotation:Text:An Introduction to Radical Constructivism/Oh4jvfj68h - Revision history

Sarah Oberbichler at 10:14, 23 July 2019

2019-07-23T10:14:58Z

Sarah Oberbichler at 15:34, 13 June 2019

2019-06-13T15:34:43Z

Sarah Oberbichler: Created page with "{{Argumentation2}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Text:An_Introduction_to_Radical_Constructivism |AnnotationComment=In other words, experience as well as all objects of experi..."

2019-06-13T15:34:18Z

Created page with "{{Argumentation2}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Text:An_Introduction_to_Radical_Constructivism |AnnotationComment=In other words, experience as well as all objects of experi..."

New page

{{Argumentation2}}
{{TextAnnotation
|AnnotationOf=Text:An_Introduction_to_Radical_Constructivism
|AnnotationComment=In other words, experience as well as all objects of experience are under all circumstances the result of our ways and means of experiencing, and are necessarily structured and determined by space and time and the other categories derived from these
|LastModificationDate=2019-06-13T17:34:03.518Z
|LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler
|AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Oh4jvfj68h","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ30Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ30Ӻ","endOffset":1375°Ӻ,"quote":"Our main question was how it might come about that we experience a relatively stable and reliable world in spite of the fact that we are unable to ascribe stability, regularity, or any other perceived property to an objective reality. Vico does not answer that question; rather, he makes it superfluous and meaningless. If, as he says, the world that we experience and get to know is necessarily constructed by ourselves, it should not surprise us that it seems relatively stable. To appreciate this, it is necessary to keep in mind that the most fundamental trait of constructivist epistemology, i.e., that the world that is constructed is an experiential world that consists of experiences and makes no claim whatsoever about “truth” in the sense of correspondence with an ontological reality. Hence, Vico’s position is in that respect similar to that of Kant, who says; “Nature, therefore … is the collective conception of all objects of experience.”Ӷ23Ӻ For Kant, it is the “raw material of sensory impression” which “the mind’s activity ... processes so that it becomes knowledge of objects that we call experience.”Ӷ24Ӻ In other words, experience as well as all objects of experience are under all circumstances the result of our ways and means of experiencing, and are necessarily structured and determined by space and time and the other categories derived from these","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery3210202764590961224342":^°°,^"jQuery3210202764590961224342":^°°,^"jQuery3210202764590961224342":^°°,^"jQuery3210202764590961224342":^°°,^"jQuery3210202764590961224342":^°°,^"jQuery3210202764590961224342":^°°,^"jQuery3210202764590961224342":^°°Ӻ,"text":" In other words, experience as well as all objects of experience are under all circumstances the result of our ways and means of experiencing, and are necessarily structured and determined by space and time and the other categories derived from these","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Argumentation2","data_creacio":1560440043218°
}}
{{Thema
|field_text_autocomplete=Erfahrung
}}

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 {{TextAnnotation
 |AnnotationOf=Text:An_Introduction_to_Radical_Constructivism
-|AnnotationComment=In other words, experience as well as all objects of experience are under all circumstances the result of our ways and means of experiencing, and are necessarily structured and determined by space and time and the other categories derived from these
+|LastModificationDate=2019-07-23T12:14:57.389Z
 |LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler
-|AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Oh4jvfj68h","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ30Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ30Ӻ","endOffset":1375°Ӻ,"quote":"Our main question was how it might come about that we experience a relatively stable and reliable world in spite of the fact that we are unable to ascribe stability, regularity, or any other perceived property to an objective reality. Vico does not answer that question; rather, he makes it superfluous and meaningless. If, as he says, the world that we experience and get to know is necessarily constructed by ourselves, it should not surprise us that it seems relatively stable. To appreciate this, it is necessary to keep in mind that the most fundamental trait of constructivist epistemology, i.e., that the world that is constructed is an experiential world that consists of experiences and makes no claim whatsoever about “truth” in the sense of correspondence with an ontological reality. Hence, Vico’s position is in that respect similar to that of Kant, who says; “Nature, therefore … is the collective conception of all objects of experience.”Ӷ23Ӻ For Kant, it is the “raw material of sensory impression” which “the mind’s activity ... processes so that it becomes knowledge of objects that we call experience.”Ӷ24Ӻ In other words, experience as well as all objects of experience are under all circumstances the result of our ways and means of experiencing, and are necessarily structured and determined by space and time and the other categories derived from these","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery3210202764590961224342":^°°,^"jQuery3210202764590961224342":^°°,^"jQuery3210202764590961224342":^°°,^"jQuery3210202764590961224342":^°°,^"jQuery3210202764590961224342":^°°,^"jQuery3210202764590961224342":^°°,^"jQuery3210202764590961224342":^°°Ӻ,"text":" In other words, experience as well as all objects of experience are under all circumstances the result of our ways and means of experiencing, and are necessarily structured and determined by space and time and the other categories derived from these","category":"Argumentation2","data_creacio":1560440043218°
+|AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Oh4jvfj68h","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ30Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ30Ӻ","endOffset":1375°Ӻ,"quote":"Our main question was how it might come about that we experience a relatively stable and reliable world in spite of the fact that we are unable to ascribe stability, regularity, or any other perceived property to an objective reality. Vico does not answer that question; rather, he makes it superfluous and meaningless. If, as he says, the world that we experience and get to know is necessarily constructed by ourselves, it should not surprise us that it seems relatively stable. To appreciate this, it is necessary to keep in mind that the most fundamental trait of constructivist epistemology, i.e., that the world that is constructed is an experiential world that consists of experiences and makes no claim whatsoever about “truth” in the sense of correspondence with an ontological reality. Hence, Vico’s position is in that respect similar to that of Kant, who says; “Nature, therefore … is the collective conception of all objects of experience.”Ӷ23Ӻ For Kant, it is the “raw material of sensory impression” which “the mind’s activity ... processes so that it becomes knowledge of objects that we call experience.”Ӷ24Ӻ In other words, experience as well as all objects of experience are under all circumstances the result of our ways and means of experiencing, and are necessarily structured and determined by space and time and the other categories derived from these","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery32109168521032311262":^°°,^"jQuery32109168521032311262":^°,"sizzle1563875556486":^"undefined":^"parentNode":Ӷ40561,31,trueӺ°°°,^"jQuery32109168521032311262":^°,"sizzle1563875556486":^"undefined":^"parentNode":Ӷ41419,31,trueӺ°°°,^"jQuery32109168521032311262":^°,"sizzle1563875556486":^"undefined":^"parentNode":Ӷ41581,31,trueӺ°°°,^"jQuery32109168521032311262":^°,"sizzle1563875556486":^"undefined":^"parentNode":Ӷ41675,31,trueӺ°°°,^"jQuery32109168521032311262":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","category":"Argumentation2","data_creacio":1560440043218°
 }}
 {{Thema

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 |AnnotationOf=Text:An_Introduction_to_Radical_Constructivism
 |AnnotationComment=In other words, experience as well as all objects of experience are under all circumstances the result of our ways and means of experiencing, and are necessarily structured and determined by space and time and the other categories derived from these
-|LastModificationDate=2019-06-13T17:34:03.518Z
+|LastModificationDate=2019-06-13T17:34:38.195Z
 |LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler
-|AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Oh4jvfj68h","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ30Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ30Ӻ","endOffset":1375°Ӻ,"quote":"Our main question was how it might come about that we experience a relatively stable and reliable world in spite of the fact that we are unable to ascribe stability, regularity, or any other perceived property to an objective reality. Vico does not answer that question; rather, he makes it superfluous and meaningless. If, as he says, the world that we experience and get to know is necessarily constructed by ourselves, it should not surprise us that it seems relatively stable. To appreciate this, it is necessary to keep in mind that the most fundamental trait of constructivist epistemology, i.e., that the world that is constructed is an experiential world that consists of experiences and makes no claim whatsoever about “truth” in the sense of correspondence with an ontological reality. Hence, Vico’s position is in that respect similar to that of Kant, who says; “Nature, therefore … is the collective conception of all objects of experience.”Ӷ23Ӻ For Kant, it is the “raw material of sensory impression” which “the mind’s activity ... processes so that it becomes knowledge of objects that we call experience.”Ӷ24Ӻ In other words, experience as well as all objects of experience are under all circumstances the result of our ways and means of experiencing, and are necessarily structured and determined by space and time and the other categories derived from these","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery3210202764590961224342":^°°,^"jQuery3210202764590961224342":^°°,^"jQuery3210202764590961224342":^°°,^"jQuery3210202764590961224342":^°°,^"jQuery3210202764590961224342":^°°,^"jQuery3210202764590961224342":^°°,^"jQuery3210202764590961224342":^°°Ӻ,"text":" In other words, experience as well as all objects of experience are under all circumstances the result of our ways and means of experiencing, and are necessarily structured and determined by space and time and the other categories derived from these","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Argumentation2","data_creacio":1560440043218°
+|AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Oh4jvfj68h","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ30Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ30Ӻ","endOffset":1375°Ӻ,"quote":"Our main question was how it might come about that we experience a relatively stable and reliable world in spite of the fact that we are unable to ascribe stability, regularity, or any other perceived property to an objective reality. Vico does not answer that question; rather, he makes it superfluous and meaningless. If, as he says, the world that we experience and get to know is necessarily constructed by ourselves, it should not surprise us that it seems relatively stable. To appreciate this, it is necessary to keep in mind that the most fundamental trait of constructivist epistemology, i.e., that the world that is constructed is an experiential world that consists of experiences and makes no claim whatsoever about “truth” in the sense of correspondence with an ontological reality. Hence, Vico’s position is in that respect similar to that of Kant, who says; “Nature, therefore … is the collective conception of all objects of experience.”Ӷ23Ӻ For Kant, it is the “raw material of sensory impression” which “the mind’s activity ... processes so that it becomes knowledge of objects that we call experience.”Ӷ24Ӻ In other words, experience as well as all objects of experience are under all circumstances the result of our ways and means of experiencing, and are necessarily structured and determined by space and time and the other categories derived from these","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery3210202764590961224342":^°°,^"jQuery3210202764590961224342":^°°,^"jQuery3210202764590961224342":^°°,^"jQuery3210202764590961224342":^°°,^"jQuery3210202764590961224342":^°°,^"jQuery3210202764590961224342":^°°,^"jQuery3210202764590961224342":^°°Ӻ,"text":" In other words, experience as well as all objects of experience are under all circumstances the result of our ways and means of experiencing, and are necessarily structured and determined by space and time and the other categories derived from these","category":"Argumentation2","data_creacio":1560440043218°
 }}
 {{Thema
 |field_text_autocomplete=Erfahrung
 }}