Sarah Oberbichler: Created page with "{{Innovationsdiskurs2}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Text:Piaget’s_Legacy:_Cognition_as_Adaptive_Activity |LastModificationDate=2019-07-26T13:47:09.680Z |LastModificationU..."

2019-07-26T11:47:22Z

Created page with "{{Innovationsdiskurs2}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Text:Piaget’s_Legacy:_Cognition_as_Adaptive_Activity |LastModificationDate=2019-07-26T13:47:09.680Z |LastModificationU..."

New page

{{Innovationsdiskurs2}}
{{TextAnnotation
|AnnotationOf=Text:Piaget’s_Legacy:_Cognition_as_Adaptive_Activity
|LastModificationDate=2019-07-26T13:47:09.680Z
|LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler
|AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Jnq42tnvi9","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ34Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ34Ӻ","endOffset":460°Ӻ,"quote":"The concept of adaptation was first applied to cognition, by William James, Georg Simmel, Hans Vaihinger, and others, around the turn of the century. It then became the main stay in Piaget’s “Genetic Epistemology”. Today it is also a key concept in Evolutionary Epistemology. However, as far as I have understood the proponents of this school, they share the traditional illusion that adaptation brings our knowledge closer to a postulated ontological reality.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321091777439976599082":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Innovationsdiskurs2","data_creacio":1564141628978°
}}
{{Innovationstyp
|field_text_autocomplete=Kritik an der traditionellen Erkenntnistheorie
}}

Annotation:Text:Piaget’s Legacy: Cognition as Adaptive Activity/Jnq42tnvi9 - Revision history

Sarah Oberbichler: Created page with "{{Innovationsdiskurs2}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Text:Piaget’s_Legacy:_Cognition_as_Adaptive_Activity |LastModificationDate=2019-07-26T13:47:09.680Z |LastModificationU..."