Annotation:Text:The Construction of Knowledge/Cvtx7rlhb6 - Revision history

Admin at 15:30, 18 March 2020

2020-03-18T15:30:40Z

Sarah Oberbichler at 18:45, 2 July 2019

2019-07-02T18:45:48Z

Sarah Oberbichler: Created page with "{{Argumentation2}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Text:The_Construction_of_Knowledge |LastModificationDate=2019-07-02T20:27:28.037Z |LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichle..."

2019-07-02T18:45:03Z

Created page with "{{Argumentation2}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Text:The_Construction_of_Knowledge |LastModificationDate=2019-07-02T20:27:28.037Z |LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichle..."

New page

{{Argumentation2}}
{{TextAnnotation
|AnnotationOf=Text:The_Construction_of_Knowledge
|LastModificationDate=2019-07-02T20:27:28.037Z
|LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler
|AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Cvtx7rlhb6","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ6Ӻ","startOffset":2579,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ6Ӻ","endOffset":3489°Ӻ,"quote":"The first person to take this idea and bring it into cognition was Mark Baldwin,\nwho was one of Jean Piaget’s teachers in Paris. Piaget then developed it into a fullfledged theory of cognition and cognitive development.6 Throughout his works he\nrepeated that cognition was an adaptive activity.\nIn my opinion, however, a great many readers of Piaget never took this seriously.\nAnd still today, most read Piaget as though he talked about knowledge of the old kind,\nknowledge that is representational.\nIf one tries to make a coherent interpretation of Piaget, one comes to the\nconclusion that this can be done only through a change of the concept of knowing and\nthe concept of knowledge, a change from the representational to the adaptive.\nIn this changed perspective, then, knowledge does not provide a representation\nof an independent world but rather a map of what can be done in the experienced\nenvironment.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321061453010698174142":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Argumentation2","data_creacio":1562092047202°
}}

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 |LastModificationDate=2019-07-02T20:45:43.793Z
 |LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler
-|AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Cvtx7rlhb6","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ6Ӻ","startOffset":2579,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ6Ӻ","endOffset":3489°Ӻ,"quote":"The first person to take this idea and bring it into cognition was Mark Baldwin,\nwho was one of Jean Piaget’s teachers in Paris. Piaget then developed it into a fullfledged theory of cognition and cognitive development.6 Throughout his works he\nrepeated that cognition was an adaptive activity.\nIn my opinion, however, a great many readers of Piaget never took this seriously.\nAnd still today, most read Piaget as though he talked about knowledge of the old kind,\nknowledge that is representational.\nIf one tries to make a coherent interpretation of Piaget, one comes to the\nconclusion that this can be done only through a change of the concept of knowing and\nthe concept of knowledge, a change from the representational to the adaptive.\nIn this changed perspective, then, knowledge does not provide a representation\nof an independent world but rather a map of what can be done in the experienced\nenvironment.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321061453010698174142":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","category":"Argumentation2","data_creacio":1562092047202°
+|AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Cvtx7rlhb6","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ6Ӻ","startOffset":2579,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ6Ӻ","endOffset":3488°Ӻ,"quote":"The first person to take this idea and bring it into cognition was Mark Baldwin,\nwho was one of Jean Piaget’s teachers in Paris. Piaget then developed it into a fullfledged theory of cognition and cognitive development.6 Throughout his works he\nrepeated that cognition was an adaptive activity.\nIn my opinion, however, a great many readers of Piaget never took this seriously.\nAnd still today, most read Piaget as though he talked about knowledge of the old kind,\nknowledge that is representational.\nIf one tries to make a coherent interpretation of Piaget, one comes to the\nconclusion that this can be done only through a change of the concept of knowing and\nthe concept of knowledge, a change from the representational to the adaptive.\nIn this changed perspective, then, knowledge does not provide a representation\nof an independent world but rather a map of what can be done in the experienced environment.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321061453010698174142":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","category":"Argumentation2","data_creacio":1562092047202°
 }}
 {{Thema
 |field_text_autocomplete=Wissen
 }}

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 {{TextAnnotation
 |AnnotationOf=Text:The_Construction_of_Knowledge
-|LastModificationDate=2019-07-02T20:27:28.037Z
+|LastModificationDate=2019-07-02T20:45:43.793Z
 |LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler
-|AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Cvtx7rlhb6","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ6Ӻ","startOffset":2579,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ6Ӻ","endOffset":3489°Ӻ,"quote":"The first person to take this idea and bring it into cognition was Mark Baldwin,\nwho was one of Jean Piaget’s teachers in Paris. Piaget then developed it into a fullfledged theory of cognition and cognitive development.6 Throughout his works he\nrepeated that cognition was an adaptive activity.\nIn my opinion, however, a great many readers of Piaget never took this seriously.\nAnd still today, most read Piaget as though he talked about knowledge of the old kind,\nknowledge that is representational.\nIf one tries to make a coherent interpretation of Piaget, one comes to the\nconclusion that this can be done only through a change of the concept of knowing and\nthe concept of knowledge, a change from the representational to the adaptive.\nIn this changed perspective, then, knowledge does not provide a representation\nof an independent world but rather a map of what can be done in the experienced\nenvironment.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321061453010698174142":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Argumentation2","data_creacio":1562092047202°
+|AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Cvtx7rlhb6","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ6Ӻ","startOffset":2579,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ6Ӻ","endOffset":3489°Ӻ,"quote":"The first person to take this idea and bring it into cognition was Mark Baldwin,\nwho was one of Jean Piaget’s teachers in Paris. Piaget then developed it into a fullfledged theory of cognition and cognitive development.6 Throughout his works he\nrepeated that cognition was an adaptive activity.\nIn my opinion, however, a great many readers of Piaget never took this seriously.\nAnd still today, most read Piaget as though he talked about knowledge of the old kind,\nknowledge that is representational.\nIf one tries to make a coherent interpretation of Piaget, one comes to the\nconclusion that this can be done only through a change of the concept of knowing and\nthe concept of knowledge, a change from the representational to the adaptive.\nIn this changed perspective, then, knowledge does not provide a representation\nof an independent world but rather a map of what can be done in the experienced\nenvironment.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321061453010698174142":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","category":"Argumentation2","data_creacio":1562092047202°
 }}