Annotation:Text:Why Constructivism Must be Radical/Jc81zyxalf - Revision history

Sarah Oberbichler at 17:15, 20 September 2019

2019-09-20T17:15:24Z

Sarah Oberbichler at 17:15, 20 September 2019

2019-09-20T17:15:01Z

Sarah Oberbichler: Created page with "{{Argumentation2}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Text:Why_Constructivism_Must_be_Radical |LastModificationDate=2019-09-20T19:14:25.590Z |LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberb..."

2019-09-20T17:14:34Z

Created page with "{{Argumentation2}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Text:Why_Constructivism_Must_be_Radical |LastModificationDate=2019-09-20T19:14:25.590Z |LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberb..."

New page

{{Argumentation2}}
{{TextAnnotation
|AnnotationOf=Text:Why_Constructivism_Must_be_Radical
|LastModificationDate=2019-09-20T19:14:25.590Z
|LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler
|AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Jc81zyxalf","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ11Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ11Ӻ","endOffset":678°Ӻ,"quote":"Fourth, from the constructivist perspective, scientific knowledge is made up of theoretical models which have proved viable within a given area of experience. Even if a particular scientific model is the best available at the moment, it should never be viewed as the only possibility of solving the problems for which it was designed. Furthermore, whenever several solutions have been found, one of them may be preferred for reasons of economy, simplicity or “elegance.” but not because it is “true” in an ontological sense. Instead of “truth.” constructivism speaks of viability and compatibility with previously constructed models. In other words, scientific models are tools.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery3210413197432160228862":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Argumentation2","data_creacio":1568999663279°
}}
{{Thema
|field_text_autocomplete=Viabilität
}}
{{Thema
|field_text_autocomplete=Wissen
}}

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 {{TextAnnotation
 |AnnotationOf=Text:Why_Constructivism_Must_be_Radical
-|LastModificationDate=2019-09-20T19:14:55.080Z
+|LastModificationDate=2019-09-20T19:15:19.254Z
 |LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler
 |AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Jc81zyxalf","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ11Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ11Ӻ","endOffset":678°Ӻ,"quote":"Fourth, from the constructivist perspective, scientific knowledge is made up of theoretical models which have proved viable within a given area of experience. Even if a particular scientific model is the best available at the moment, it should never be viewed as the only possibility of solving the problems for which it was designed. Furthermore, whenever several solutions have been found, one of them may be preferred for reasons of economy, simplicity or “elegance.” but not because it is “true” in an ontological sense. Instead of “truth.” constructivism speaks of viability and compatibility with previously constructed models. In other words, scientific models are tools.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery3210413197432160228862":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","category":"Argumentation2","data_creacio":1568999663279°
@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 {{Thema
 |field_text_autocomplete=Viabilität
 }}
 {{Thema
 |field_text_autocomplete=Realität
 }}