Difference between revisions of "Annotation:Why I Consider Myself a Cybernetician/Wbwmd57tim"
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|LastModificationDate=2019-02-26T20:41:44.206Z | |LastModificationDate=2019-02-26T20:41:44.206Z | ||
|LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler | |LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler | ||
| − | |AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Wbwmd57tim","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ18Ӻ","startOffset": | + | |AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Wbwmd57tim","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ18Ӻ","startOffset":409,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ19Ӻ","endOffset":527°Ӻ,"quote":"In general terms, the reduction of an error signal is always a move towards equilibrium. By the way, that there are two ways of reducing error or perturbation is, of course, a feature psychotherapists know quite well. When something upsets you, you may try to change either that thing or your conviction that it is upsetting. – So much for the cybernetics of control.\nThat leaves the question of communication. Earlier I suggest-ed that we adjust the meaning we attribute to words when we discover that we have it “wrong”. We adapt to the constraints imposed by the way we think other speakers use language. But when we feel we are using words “right”, when we are being “understood”, we should not allude ourselves that we have come to share the meanings of those others whom we believe we understand – we have merely avoided noticeable discrepancies in the context of the particular situation.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery3210266436671543879952":^°°,^"jQuery3210266436671543879952":^°°,^"jQuery3210266436671543879952":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Prämisse","data_creacio":1551210103873° |
|AnnotationOf=Why_I_Consider_Myself_a_Cybernetician | |AnnotationOf=Why_I_Consider_Myself_a_Cybernetician | ||
|LastModificationDate=2019-02-26T20:41:44.206Z | |LastModificationDate=2019-02-26T20:41:44.206Z | ||
|LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler | |LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler | ||
| − | |AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Wbwmd57tim","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ18Ӻ","startOffset": | + | |AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Wbwmd57tim","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ18Ӻ","startOffset":409,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ19Ӻ","endOffset":527°Ӻ,"quote":"In general terms, the reduction of an error signal is always a move towards equilibrium. By the way, that there are two ways of reducing error or perturbation is, of course, a feature psychotherapists know quite well. When something upsets you, you may try to change either that thing or your conviction that it is upsetting. – So much for the cybernetics of control.\nThat leaves the question of communication. Earlier I suggest-ed that we adjust the meaning we attribute to words when we discover that we have it “wrong”. We adapt to the constraints imposed by the way we think other speakers use language. But when we feel we are using words “right”, when we are being “understood”, we should not allude ourselves that we have come to share the meanings of those others whom we believe we understand – we have merely avoided noticeable discrepancies in the context of the particular situation.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery3210266436671543879952":^°°,^"jQuery3210266436671543879952":^°°,^"jQuery3210266436671543879952":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Prämisse","data_creacio":1551210103873° |
|AnnotationOf=Why_I_Consider_Myself_a_Cybernetician | |AnnotationOf=Why_I_Consider_Myself_a_Cybernetician | ||
|LastModificationDate=2019-02-26T20:41:44.206Z | |LastModificationDate=2019-02-26T20:41:44.206Z | ||
|LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler | |LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler | ||
| − | |AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Wbwmd57tim","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ18Ӻ","startOffset": | + | |AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Wbwmd57tim","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ18Ӻ","startOffset":409,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ19Ӻ","endOffset":527°Ӻ,"quote":"In general terms, the reduction of an error signal is always a move towards equilibrium. By the way, that there are two ways of reducing error or perturbation is, of course, a feature psychotherapists know quite well. When something upsets you, you may try to change either that thing or your conviction that it is upsetting. – So much for the cybernetics of control.\nThat leaves the question of communication. Earlier I suggest-ed that we adjust the meaning we attribute to words when we discover that we have it “wrong”. We adapt to the constraints imposed by the way we think other speakers use language. But when we feel we are using words “right”, when we are being “understood”, we should not allude ourselves that we have come to share the meanings of those others whom we believe we understand – we have merely avoided noticeable discrepancies in the context of the particular situation.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery3210266436671543879952":^°°,^"jQuery3210266436671543879952":^°°,^"jQuery3210266436671543879952":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Prämisse","data_creacio":1551210103873° |
|AnnotationOf=Why_I_Consider_Myself_a_Cybernetician | |AnnotationOf=Why_I_Consider_Myself_a_Cybernetician | ||
|LastModificationDate=2019-02-26T20:41:44.206Z | |LastModificationDate=2019-02-26T20:41:44.206Z | ||
|LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler | |LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler | ||
| − | |AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Wbwmd57tim","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ18Ӻ","startOffset": | + | |AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Wbwmd57tim","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ18Ӻ","startOffset":409,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ19Ӻ","endOffset":527°Ӻ,"quote":"In general terms, the reduction of an error signal is always a move towards equilibrium. By the way, that there are two ways of reducing error or perturbation is, of course, a feature psychotherapists know quite well. When something upsets you, you may try to change either that thing or your conviction that it is upsetting. – So much for the cybernetics of control.\nThat leaves the question of communication. Earlier I suggest-ed that we adjust the meaning we attribute to words when we discover that we have it “wrong”. We adapt to the constraints imposed by the way we think other speakers use language. But when we feel we are using words “right”, when we are being “understood”, we should not allude ourselves that we have come to share the meanings of those others whom we believe we understand – we have merely avoided noticeable discrepancies in the context of the particular situation.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery3210266436671543879952":^°°,^"jQuery3210266436671543879952":^°°,^"jQuery3210266436671543879952":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Prämisse","data_creacio":1551210103873° |
}} | }} | ||
{{TextAnnotation}} | {{TextAnnotation}} | ||
{{TextAnnotation}} | {{TextAnnotation}} | ||
{{TextAnnotation}} | {{TextAnnotation}} | ||
Latest revision as of 08:14, 24 April 2019
| Annotation of | Why_I_Consider_Myself_a_Cybernetician |
|---|---|
| Annotation Comment | |
| Last Modification Date | 2019-02-26T20:41:44.206Z |
| Last Modification User | User:Sarah Oberbichler |
| Annotation Metadata | ^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Wbwmd57tim","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ18Ӻ","startOffset":409,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ19Ӻ","endOffset":527°Ӻ,"quote":"In general terms, the reduction of an error signal is always a move towards equilibrium. By the way, that there are two ways of reducing error or perturbation is, of course, a feature psychotherapists know quite well. When something upsets you, you may try to change either that thing or your conviction that it is upsetting. – So much for the cybernetics of control.\nThat leaves the question of communication. Earlier I suggest-ed that we adjust the meaning we attribute to words when we discover that we have it “wrong”. We adapt to the constraints imposed by the way we think other speakers use language. But when we feel we are using words “right”, when we are being “understood”, we should not allude ourselves that we have come to share the meanings of those others whom we believe we understand – we have merely avoided noticeable discrepancies in the context of the particular situation.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery3210266436671543879952":^°°,^"jQuery3210266436671543879952":^°°,^"jQuery3210266436671543879952":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Prämisse","data_creacio":1551210103873°
|
| Annotation of | |
|---|---|
| Annotation Comment | |
| Last Modification Date | |
| Last Modification User | |
| Annotation Metadata |
| Annotation of | |
|---|---|
| Annotation Comment | |
| Last Modification Date | |
| Last Modification User | |
| Annotation Metadata |
| Annotation of | |
|---|---|
| Annotation Comment | |
| Last Modification Date | |
| Last Modification User | |
| Annotation Metadata |
