Difference between revisions of "Annotation:The Construction of Knowledge/Nclwd46km4"

From DigiVis
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Argument
 
{{Argument
 
|field_radiobutton=pro
 
|field_radiobutton=pro
 +
}}
 +
{{Thema
 +
|field_text_autocomplete=Realität
 +
}}
 +
{{Thema
 +
|field_text_autocomplete=Raum und Zeit
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{TextAnnotation
 
{{TextAnnotation
 
|AnnotationOf=The_Construction_of_Knowledge
 
|AnnotationOf=The_Construction_of_Knowledge
|AnnotationComment=Konklusion: Zeit ist keine Illusion
+
|AnnotationComment=Prämissen: Auch wenn die Welt konstruiert ist, kann ich eine zwischen erfahrener Realität und Illussion unterscheiden; Um eine ratinale Realität zu kreieren, braucht es eine Zeit und einen Raum; Konklusion: Zeit ist keine Illusion
|LastModificationDate=2019-03-06T17:09:15.215Z
+
|LastModificationDate=2019-03-06T17:12:15.683Z
 
|LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler
 
|LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler
|AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Nclwd46km4","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ10Ӻ","startOffset":2517,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ10Ӻ","endOffset":3226°Ӻ,"quote":"To me, therefore, time is not, as Prigogine said, an illusion. If I called the\nconstruct of time an illusion, the entire world that I know, the world that I live in,\nwould also have to be called an illusion. And that is not the way I would characterize\nit. Although my entire world is a construction, I can still make a useful distinction in it\nbetween illusion and reality. But remember that for me “reality” always refers to\nexperiential reality, not to the ontological reality of traditional philosophy. If we want\nto construct a rational reality for ourselves, time and space are indispensable building\nblocks, and I would rather call “illusion” any claim to knowledge beyond the field of\nour experience.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321056567143152368352":^°°,^"jQuery321056567143152368352":^°°,^"jQuery321056567143152368352":^°°,^"jQuery321056567143152368352":^°°Ӻ,"text":"Konklusion: Zeit ist keine Illusion","category":"Argument","data_creacio":1551888548146°
+
|AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Nclwd46km4","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ10Ӻ","startOffset":2517,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ10Ӻ","endOffset":3226°Ӻ,"quote":"To me, therefore, time is not, as Prigogine said, an illusion. If I called the\nconstruct of time an illusion, the entire world that I know, the world that I live in,\nwould also have to be called an illusion. And that is not the way I would characterize\nit. Although my entire world is a construction, I can still make a useful distinction in it\nbetween illusion and reality. But remember that for me “reality” always refers to\nexperiential reality, not to the ontological reality of traditional philosophy. If we want\nto construct a rational reality for ourselves, time and space are indispensable building\nblocks, and I would rather call “illusion” any claim to knowledge beyond the field of\nour experience.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321056567143152368352":^°°,^"jQuery321056567143152368352":^°°,^"jQuery321056567143152368352":^°°,^"jQuery321056567143152368352":^°°Ӻ,"text":"Prämissen: Auch wenn die Welt konstruiert ist, kann ich eine zwischen erfahrener Realität und Illussion unterscheiden; Um eine ratinale Realität zu kreieren, braucht es eine Zeit und einen Raum; Konklusion: Zeit ist keine Illusion","category":"Argument","data_creacio":1551888548146°
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 17:12, 6 March 2019


Thema Realität
Thema Raum und Zeit
Annotation of The_Construction_of_Knowledge
Annotation Comment Prämissen: Auch wenn die Welt konstruiert ist, kann ich eine zwischen erfahrener Realität und Illussion unterscheiden; Um eine ratinale Realität zu kreieren, braucht es eine Zeit und einen Raum; Konklusion: Zeit ist keine Illusion
Last Modification Date 2019-03-06T17:12:15.683Z
Last Modification User User:Sarah Oberbichler
Annotation Metadata
^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Nclwd46km4","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ10Ӻ","startOffset":2517,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ10Ӻ","endOffset":3226°Ӻ,"quote":"To me, therefore, time is not, as Prigogine said, an illusion. If I called the\nconstruct of time an illusion, the entire world that I know, the world that I live in,\nwould also have to be called an illusion. And that is not the way I would characterize\nit. Although my entire world is a construction, I can still make a useful distinction in it\nbetween illusion and reality. But remember that for me “reality” always refers to\nexperiential reality, not to the ontological reality of traditional philosophy. If we want\nto construct a rational reality for ourselves, time and space are indispensable building\nblocks, and I would rather call “illusion” any claim to knowledge beyond the field of\nour experience.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321056567143152368352":^°°,^"jQuery321056567143152368352":^°°,^"jQuery321056567143152368352":^°°,^"jQuery321056567143152368352":^°°Ӻ,"text":"Prämissen: Auch wenn die Welt konstruiert ist, kann ich eine zwischen erfahrener Realität und Illussion unterscheiden; Um eine ratinale Realität zu kreieren, braucht es eine Zeit und einen Raum; Konklusion: Zeit ist keine Illusion","category":"Argument","data_creacio":1551888548146°