Difference between revisions of "Annotation:Text:Why Constructivism Must be Radical/Jc81zyxalf"
(Created page with "{{Argumentation2}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Text:Why_Constructivism_Must_be_Radical |LastModificationDate=2019-09-20T19:14:25.590Z |LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberb...") |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{TextAnnotation | {{TextAnnotation | ||
|AnnotationOf=Text:Why_Constructivism_Must_be_Radical | |AnnotationOf=Text:Why_Constructivism_Must_be_Radical | ||
| − | |LastModificationDate=2019-09-20T19: | + | |LastModificationDate=2019-09-20T19:15:19.254Z |
|LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler | |LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler | ||
| − | |AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Jc81zyxalf","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ11Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ11Ӻ","endOffset":678°Ӻ,"quote":"Fourth, from the constructivist perspective, scientific knowledge is made up of theoretical models which have proved viable within a given area of experience. Even if a particular scientific model is the best available at the moment, it should never be viewed as the only possibility of solving the problems for which it was designed. Furthermore, whenever several solutions have been found, one of them may be preferred for reasons of economy, simplicity or “elegance.” but not because it is “true” in an ontological sense. Instead of “truth.” constructivism speaks of viability and compatibility with previously constructed models. In other words, scientific models are tools.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery3210413197432160228862":^°°Ӻ,"text":" | + | |AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Jc81zyxalf","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ11Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ11Ӻ","endOffset":678°Ӻ,"quote":"Fourth, from the constructivist perspective, scientific knowledge is made up of theoretical models which have proved viable within a given area of experience. Even if a particular scientific model is the best available at the moment, it should never be viewed as the only possibility of solving the problems for which it was designed. Furthermore, whenever several solutions have been found, one of them may be preferred for reasons of economy, simplicity or “elegance.” but not because it is “true” in an ontological sense. Instead of “truth.” constructivism speaks of viability and compatibility with previously constructed models. In other words, scientific models are tools.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery3210413197432160228862":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","category":"Argumentation2","data_creacio":1568999663279° |
}} | }} | ||
{{Thema | {{Thema | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Thema | {{Thema | ||
| − | |field_text_autocomplete= | + | |field_text_autocomplete=Realität |
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 18:15, 20 September 2019
| Annotation of | Text:Why_Constructivism_Must_be_Radical |
|---|---|
| Annotation Comment | |
| Last Modification Date | 2019-09-20T19:15:19.254Z |
| Last Modification User | User:Sarah Oberbichler |
| Annotation Metadata | ^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Jc81zyxalf","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ11Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ11Ӻ","endOffset":678°Ӻ,"quote":"Fourth, from the constructivist perspective, scientific knowledge is made up of theoretical models which have proved viable within a given area of experience. Even if a particular scientific model is the best available at the moment, it should never be viewed as the only possibility of solving the problems for which it was designed. Furthermore, whenever several solutions have been found, one of them may be preferred for reasons of economy, simplicity or “elegance.” but not because it is “true” in an ontological sense. Instead of “truth.” constructivism speaks of viability and compatibility with previously constructed models. In other words, scientific models are tools.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery3210413197432160228862":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","category":"Argumentation2","data_creacio":1568999663279°
|
| Thema | Viabilität |
|---|
| Thema | Realität |
|---|
