Difference between revisions of "Annotation:The Development of Language as Purposive Behavior*/Rrk1y4olk5"
(Created page with "{{RhetorischeFigur}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=The_Development_of_Language_as_Purposive_Behavior* |LastModificationDate=2019-02-26T14:18:54.984Z |LastModificationUser=Use...") |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{TextAnnotation | {{TextAnnotation | ||
|AnnotationOf=The_Development_of_Language_as_Purposive_Behavior* | |AnnotationOf=The_Development_of_Language_as_Purposive_Behavior* | ||
| − | |LastModificationDate=2019-02-26T14: | + | |AnnotationComment=Infragestellen, Irrweg aufzeigen |
| + | |LastModificationDate=2019-02-26T14:19:25.151Z | ||
|LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler | |LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler | ||
| − | |AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Rrk1y4olk5","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ4Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ4Ӻ","endOffset":372°Ӻ,"quote":"For a considerable time, linguists have implicitly and even explicitly equated “language” with “speech”. They did so quite naturally because “language” had always implied human language, and human language was presumed to have manifested itself in speech long before it found other channels, such as hieroglyphs and alphabets. But there is another, less ingenuous reason.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321079218495795044192":^°°Ӻ,"text":" | + | |AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Rrk1y4olk5","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ4Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ4Ӻ","endOffset":372°Ӻ,"quote":"For a considerable time, linguists have implicitly and even explicitly equated “language” with “speech”. They did so quite naturally because “language” had always implied human language, and human language was presumed to have manifested itself in speech long before it found other channels, such as hieroglyphs and alphabets. But there is another, less ingenuous reason.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321079218495795044192":^°°Ӻ,"text":"Infragestellen, Irrweg aufzeigen","category":"Rethorische Figur","data_creacio":1551187127880° |
|AnnotationOf=The_Development_of_Language_as_Purposive_Behavior* | |AnnotationOf=The_Development_of_Language_as_Purposive_Behavior* | ||
| − | |LastModificationDate=2019-02-26T14: | + | |AnnotationComment=Infragestellen, Irrweg aufzeigen |
| + | |LastModificationDate=2019-02-26T14:19:25.151Z | ||
|LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler | |LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler | ||
| − | |AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Rrk1y4olk5","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ4Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ4Ӻ","endOffset":372°Ӻ,"quote":"For a considerable time, linguists have implicitly and even explicitly equated “language” with “speech”. They did so quite naturally because “language” had always implied human language, and human language was presumed to have manifested itself in speech long before it found other channels, such as hieroglyphs and alphabets. But there is another, less ingenuous reason.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321079218495795044192":^°°Ӻ,"text":" | + | |AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Rrk1y4olk5","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ4Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ4Ӻ","endOffset":372°Ӻ,"quote":"For a considerable time, linguists have implicitly and even explicitly equated “language” with “speech”. They did so quite naturally because “language” had always implied human language, and human language was presumed to have manifested itself in speech long before it found other channels, such as hieroglyphs and alphabets. But there is another, less ingenuous reason.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321079218495795044192":^°°Ӻ,"text":"Infragestellen, Irrweg aufzeigen","category":"Rethorische Figur","data_creacio":1551187127880° |
}} | }} | ||
{{TextAnnotation}} | {{TextAnnotation}} | ||
Latest revision as of 14:19, 26 February 2019
| Annotation of | The_Development_of_Language_as_Purposive_Behavior* |
|---|---|
| Annotation Comment | Infragestellen, Irrweg aufzeigen |
| Last Modification Date | 2019-02-26T14:19:25.151Z |
| Last Modification User | User:Sarah Oberbichler |
| Annotation Metadata | ^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Rrk1y4olk5","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ4Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ4Ӻ","endOffset":372°Ӻ,"quote":"For a considerable time, linguists have implicitly and even explicitly equated “language” with “speech”. They did so quite naturally because “language” had always implied human language, and human language was presumed to have manifested itself in speech long before it found other channels, such as hieroglyphs and alphabets. But there is another, less ingenuous reason.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321079218495795044192":^°°Ӻ,"text":"Infragestellen, Irrweg aufzeigen","category":"Rethorische Figur","data_creacio":1551187127880°
|
| Annotation of | |
|---|---|
| Annotation Comment | |
| Last Modification Date | |
| Last Modification User | |
| Annotation Metadata |
