Difference between revisions of "Annotation:Text:Abstraction, Re-Presentation, and Reflection: An Interpretation of Experience and of Piaget’s Approach/Majd8zzyla"
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
|AnnotationOf=Text:Abstraction,_Re-Presentation,_and_Reflection:_An_Interpretation_of_Experience_and_of_Piaget’s_Approach | |AnnotationOf=Text:Abstraction,_Re-Presentation,_and_Reflection:_An_Interpretation_of_Experience_and_of_Piaget’s_Approach | ||
|AnnotationComment=Reflecting upon experiences is clearly not the same as having an experience. | |AnnotationComment=Reflecting upon experiences is clearly not the same as having an experience. | ||
| − | |LastModificationDate=2019-06-13T11:36: | + | |LastModificationDate=2019-06-13T11:36:36.743Z |
|LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler | |LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler | ||
|AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Majd8zzyla","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ4Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ4Ӻ","endOffset":962°Ӻ,"quote":"If someone, having just eaten an apple, takes a bite out of a second one, and is asked which of the two tasted sweeter, we should not be surprised that the person could give an answer. Indeed, we would take it for granted that under these circumstances any normal person could make a relevant judgment. We cannot observe how such a judgment is made. But we can hypothesize some of the steps that seem necessary to make it. The sensations that accompanied the eating of the first apple would have to be remembered, at least until the question is heard.Ӷ5Ӻ Then they would have to be re- presented and compared (in regard to whatever the person called “sweetness”) with the sensations accompanying the later bite from the second apple. This re-presenting and comparing is a way of operating that is different from the processes of sensation that supplied the material for the comparison. Reflecting upon experiences is clearly not the same as having an experience.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321000354405909149324572":^°°,^"jQuery321000354405909149324572":^°°,^"jQuery321000354405909149324572":^°°Ӻ,"text":"Reflecting upon experiences is clearly not the same as having an experience.","category":"Argumentation2","data_creacio":1560418503906° | |AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Majd8zzyla","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ4Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ4Ӻ","endOffset":962°Ӻ,"quote":"If someone, having just eaten an apple, takes a bite out of a second one, and is asked which of the two tasted sweeter, we should not be surprised that the person could give an answer. Indeed, we would take it for granted that under these circumstances any normal person could make a relevant judgment. We cannot observe how such a judgment is made. But we can hypothesize some of the steps that seem necessary to make it. The sensations that accompanied the eating of the first apple would have to be remembered, at least until the question is heard.Ӷ5Ӻ Then they would have to be re- presented and compared (in regard to whatever the person called “sweetness”) with the sensations accompanying the later bite from the second apple. This re-presenting and comparing is a way of operating that is different from the processes of sensation that supplied the material for the comparison. Reflecting upon experiences is clearly not the same as having an experience.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321000354405909149324572":^°°,^"jQuery321000354405909149324572":^°°,^"jQuery321000354405909149324572":^°°Ӻ,"text":"Reflecting upon experiences is clearly not the same as having an experience.","category":"Argumentation2","data_creacio":1560418503906° | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Thema | {{Thema | ||
| − | |field_text_autocomplete= | + | |field_text_autocomplete=Erfahrung |
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 10:36, 13 June 2019
| Annotation of | Text:Abstraction,_Re-Presentation,_and_Reflection:_An_Interpretation_of_Experience_and_of_Piaget’s_Approach |
|---|---|
| Annotation Comment | Reflecting upon experiences is clearly not the same as having an experience. |
| Last Modification Date | 2019-06-13T11:36:36.743Z |
| Last Modification User | User:Sarah Oberbichler |
| Annotation Metadata | ^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Majd8zzyla","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ4Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ4Ӻ","endOffset":962°Ӻ,"quote":"If someone, having just eaten an apple, takes a bite out of a second one, and is asked which of the two tasted sweeter, we should not be surprised that the person could give an answer. Indeed, we would take it for granted that under these circumstances any normal person could make a relevant judgment. We cannot observe how such a judgment is made. But we can hypothesize some of the steps that seem necessary to make it. The sensations that accompanied the eating of the first apple would have to be remembered, at least until the question is heard.Ӷ5Ӻ Then they would have to be re- presented and compared (in regard to whatever the person called “sweetness”) with the sensations accompanying the later bite from the second apple. This re-presenting and comparing is a way of operating that is different from the processes of sensation that supplied the material for the comparison. Reflecting upon experiences is clearly not the same as having an experience.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321000354405909149324572":^°°,^"jQuery321000354405909149324572":^°°,^"jQuery321000354405909149324572":^°°Ӻ,"text":"Reflecting upon experiences is clearly not the same as having an experience.","category":"Argumentation2","data_creacio":1560418503906°
|
| Thema | Erfahrung |
|---|
