Difference between revisions of "Annotation:Text:An Introduction to Radical Constructivism/Kpp7i5zggo"

From DigiVis
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "{{Argumentation2}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Text:An_Introduction_to_Radical_Constructivism |LastModificationDate=2019-06-03T20:21:10.016Z |LastModificationUser=User:Sara...")
 
 
Line 2: Line 2:
 
{{TextAnnotation
 
{{TextAnnotation
 
|AnnotationOf=Text:An_Introduction_to_Radical_Constructivism
 
|AnnotationOf=Text:An_Introduction_to_Radical_Constructivism
|LastModificationDate=2019-06-03T20:21:10.016Z
+
|LastModificationDate=2019-10-14T18:18:59.375Z
 
|LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler
 
|LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Oberbichler
|AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Kpp7i5zggo","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ15Ӻ","startOffset":156,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ15Ӻ","endOffset":632°Ӻ,"quote":"If we take seriously the evolutionary way of thinking, it could never be organisms or ideas that adapt to reality, but it is always reality which, by limiting what is possible, inexorably annihilates what is not fit to live. In phylogenesis, as in the history of ideas, “natural selection” does not in any positive sense select the fittest, the sturdiest, the best, or the truest, but it functions negatively, in that it simply lets go under whatever does not pass the test.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321023676176873103662":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Argumentation2","data_creacio":1559586069778°
+
|AnnotationMetadata=^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Kpp7i5zggo","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ15Ӻ","startOffset":156,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ15Ӻ","endOffset":632°Ӻ,"quote":"If we take seriously the evolutionary way of thinking, it could never be organisms or ideas that adapt to reality, but it is always reality which, by limiting what is possible, inexorably annihilates what is not fit to live. In phylogenesis, as in the history of ideas, “natural selection” does not in any positive sense select the fittest, the sturdiest, the best, or the truest, but it functions negatively, in that it simply lets go under whatever does not pass the test.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery3210217163536578145022":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","category":"Argumentation2","data_creacio":1559586069778°
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{Thema
 
{{Thema
 
|field_text_autocomplete=Viabilität
 
|field_text_autocomplete=Viabilität
 +
}}
 +
{{Thema
 +
|field_text_autocomplete=Evolution
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 17:19, 14 October 2019

Annotation of Text:An_Introduction_to_Radical_Constructivism
Annotation Comment
Last Modification Date 2019-10-14T18:18:59.375Z
Last Modification User User:Sarah Oberbichler
Annotation Metadata
^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Kpp7i5zggo","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ15Ӻ","startOffset":156,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ15Ӻ","endOffset":632°Ӻ,"quote":"If we take seriously the evolutionary way of thinking, it could never be organisms or ideas that adapt to reality, but it is always reality which, by limiting what is possible, inexorably annihilates what is not fit to live. In phylogenesis, as in the history of ideas, “natural selection” does not in any positive sense select the fittest, the sturdiest, the best, or the truest, but it functions negatively, in that it simply lets go under whatever does not pass the test.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery3210217163536578145022":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","category":"Argumentation2","data_creacio":1559586069778°
Thema Viabilität
Thema Evolution