Annotation:Text:Abstraction, Re-Presentation, and Reflection: An Interpretation of Experience and of Piaget’s Approach/Xbamc6pzpc
< Annotation:Text:Abstraction, Re-Presentation, and Reflection: An Interpretation of Experience and of Piaget’s Approach
Revision as of 15:26, 13 June 2019 by Sarah Oberbichler (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Argumentation2}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Text:Abstraction,_Re-Presentation,_and_Reflection:_An_Interpretation_of_Experience_and_of_Piaget’s_Approach |LastModificati...")
Annotation of | Text:Abstraction,_Re-Presentation,_and_Reflection:_An_Interpretation_of_Experience_and_of_Piaget’s_Approach |
---|---|
Annotation Comment | |
Last Modification Date | 2019-06-13T16:26:43.009Z |
Last Modification User | User:Sarah Oberbichler |
Annotation Metadata | ^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Xbamc6pzpc","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ29Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ30Ӻ","endOffset":235°Ӻ,"quote":"The cumulative result of the minute investigations contained in these two volumes enabled Piaget to come up with an extremely sophisticated description of the mutual interaction between the construction of successful schemes and the construction of abstracted understandings, an interaction that eventually leads to accommodations and to finding solutions to problems in the re-presentational mode, i.e., without having to have run into them on the level of sensory-motor experience. In this context, one further thing must be added. In the earlier sections, I discussed the fact that re-presentation follows upon recognition and that the “pointing” function of symbols follows as the result of familiarity with the symbols’ power to bring forth re- presentations that are based on empirical abstractions. As the examples I gave of abstracted motor patterns should make clear, symbols can be used, simply to point to such patterns, in which case the re-presentation of action can be curtailed, provided the subject has consciously conceptualized the action and knows how to re-present it. I now want to emphasize that this pointing function of symbols makes possible a way of mental operating that requires conscious conceptualization and, as a result, gives more power to the symbols. Once reflective thought can be applied to the kind of abstraction Piaget ascribed to Aristotle (cf. passage quoted above), there will be awareness not only of what is being operated on but also of the operations that are being carried out. Piaget suggested this in an earlier context:\n\nA form is indissociable from its content in perception but can be manipulated independently of its content in the realm of operations, in which even forms devoid of content can be constructed and manipulated. ...logico-mathematical operations allow the construction of arrangements which are independent of content ... pure forms ... simply based on symbols. (Piaget, 1969; p. 288; my emphasis.)\nIn my terms this means, symbols can be associated with operations and, once the operations have become quite familiar, the symbols can be used to point to them without the need to produce an actual re-presentation of carrying them out.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery3210023416141222439182":^°°,^"jQuery3210023416141222439182":^°°,^"jQuery3210023416141222439182":^°°,^"jQuery3210023416141222439182":^°°,^"jQuery3210023416141222439182":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Argumentation2","data_creacio":1560436002715°
|
Thema | Wahrnehmung |
---|
Thema | Erfahrung |
---|