Annotation:Annotationen:Piaget’s Legacy: Cognition as Adaptive Activity/U69ct8sl0q

From DigiVis
< Annotation:Annotationen:Piaget’s Legacy: Cognition as Adaptive Activity
Revision as of 19:03, 24 July 2019 by Sarah Oberbichler (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Schlussfolgerung3}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Annotationen:Piaget’s_Legacy:_Cognition_as_Adaptive_Activity |AnnotationComment=According to the neurophysiologist’s m...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Annotation of Annotationen:Piaget’s_Legacy:_Cognition_as_Adaptive_Activity
Annotation Comment According to the neurophysiologist’s model of the nervous system, it therefore appears that the discrimination of sensory modalities—seeing, hearing, touching, etc.—must be the result of the system’s own computation. From this perspective, then, whatever sensory structures, patterns, or images a living system compiles are its own construction, and the notion that they represent something that was there beforehand, has no empirical foundation.
Last Modification Date 2019-07-24T20:03:24.519Z
Last Modification User User:Sarah Oberbichler
Annotation Metadata
^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"U69ct8sl0q","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ","startOffset":585,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ","endOffset":1031°Ӻ,"quote":"According to the neurophysiologist’s model of the nervous system, it therefore appears that the discrimination of sensory modalities—seeing, hearing, touching, etc.—must be the result of the system’s own computation. From this perspective, then, whatever sensory structures, patterns, or images a living system compiles are its own construction, and the notion that they represent something that was there beforehand, has no empirical foundation.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321087724610147439272":^°°Ӻ,"text":"According to the neurophysiologist’s model of the nervous system, it therefore appears that the discrimination of sensory modalities—seeing, hearing, touching, etc.—must be the result of the system’s own computation. From this perspective, then, whatever sensory structures, patterns, or images a living system compiles are its own construction, and the notion that they represent something that was there beforehand, has no empirical foundation.","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Schlussfolgerung3","data_creacio":1563991403899°