Annotation:Text:Hans G. Furth – Not Radical enough: A critique of von Glasersfeld’s Radical Epistemology/Ghe33h0wb3

Annotation of	Text:Hans_G._Furth_–_Not_Radical_enough:_A_critique_of_von_Glasersfeld’s_Radical_Epistemology
Annotation Comment
Last Modification Date	2020-01-17T11:40:59.872Z
Last Modification User	User:Sarah Oberbichler
Annotation Metadata	^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Ghe33h0wb3","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ7Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ7Ӻ","endOffset":437°Ӻ,"quote":"((7)) E. von Glasersfeld’s notions of “protospace” (47) and “prototime” (48) seem to me intriguing allusions to Piaget's sensorimotor schemes, even as the distinction between recognition and recall (50) parallels Piaget’s differentiation between sensorimotor and mental object know-how. I agree with von Glasersfeld (51) that the clearest instance of the construction of a mental object is the formation of an internal image or a symbol.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery32101117355615537122":^°°,^"jQuery32101117355615537122":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"ArgumentationFremd","data_creacio":1579257659547°

Thema	Wirklichkeit
Bezieht sich auf Argumentation:
Relation:	verträglich