Annotation:Text:Cybernetics, Experience, and the Concept of Self/Qd7w00d74a
< Annotation:Text:Cybernetics, Experience, and the Concept of Self
Revision as of 17:44, 22 June 2019 by Sarah Oberbichler (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Argumentation2}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Text:Cybernetics,_Experience,_and_the_Concept_of_Self |LastModificationDate=2019-06-22T18:44:21.297Z |LastModificationUser=Us...")
Annotation of | Text:Cybernetics,_Experience,_and_the_Concept_of_Self |
---|---|
Annotation Comment | |
Last Modification Date | 2019-06-22T18:44:21.297Z |
Last Modification User | User:Sarah Oberbichler |
Annotation Metadata | ^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Qd7w00d74a","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ29Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ29Ӻ","endOffset":867°Ӻ,"quote":"For an observer, of course, it may be plausible to establish all sorts of relations between the organism’s “output” (i.e. the effect of its activities on the environment) and its “input” (i.e. the environmental “stimuli” assumed to cause the organism’s sensory signals). But these items may not be quite as straightforward as they appear. I have elsewhere argued for a radical constructivist view of knowledge (von Glasersfeld, 1975, 1976, 1977; Richards and von Glasersfeld, 1978) on all levels of organization. Here I shall confine myself to pointing out that the kind of knowledge our simple organism acquires by installing connections between error signals and activities is, indeed, a form of construction, and since it deals exclusively with the proximal data of the organism’s own subjective experience, one would be justified in calling it wholly subjective.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321087843971429911642":^°°,^"jQuery321087843971429911642":^°°,^"jQuery321087843971429911642":^°°,^"jQuery321087843971429911642":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Argumentation2","data_creacio":1561221859460°
|
Thema | Lernen |
---|