Annotation:Text:Cybernetics, Experience, and the Concept of Self/Epvmfwwxaz

From DigiVis
< Annotation:Text:Cybernetics, Experience, and the Concept of Self
Revision as of 11:52, 24 June 2019 by Sarah Oberbichler (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Innovationsdiskurs2}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Text:Cybernetics,_Experience,_and_the_Concept_of_Self |LastModificationDate=2019-06-24T12:52:43.076Z |LastModificationUs...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Annotation of Text:Cybernetics,_Experience,_and_the_Concept_of_Self
Annotation Comment
Last Modification Date 2019-06-24T12:52:43.076Z
Last Modification User User:Sarah Oberbichler
Annotation Metadata
^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Epvmfwwxaz","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ42Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ42Ӻ","endOffset":500°Ӻ,"quote":"First, there is the tempting but logically erroneous idea that what we rightly call “environment” relative to an organism when both the organism and its environment are being observed by us, must also be our environment and can, therefore, be held causally responsible for what we ourselves experience. Second, there is the mistaken belief that the “environment” which is part of our experiential field has to be identical with the experiential field of the observed organism (von Glasersfeld, 1976).","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321069698803386308882":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Innovationsdiskurs2","data_creacio":1561373562719°
Innovationstyp Infragestellen der traditionellen Erkenntnistheorie