Annotation:Text:Cybernetics, Experience, and the Concept of Self/V1ikn396q2
< Annotation:Text:Cybernetics, Experience, and the Concept of Self
Revision as of 13:12, 24 June 2019 by Sarah Oberbichler (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Argumentation2}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Text:Cybernetics,_Experience,_and_the_Concept_of_Self |LastModificationDate=2019-06-24T14:12:07.310Z |LastModificationUser=Us...")
Annotation of | Text:Cybernetics,_Experience,_and_the_Concept_of_Self |
---|---|
Annotation Comment | |
Last Modification Date | 2019-06-24T14:12:07.310Z |
Last Modification User | User:Sarah Oberbichler |
Annotation Metadata | ^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"V1ikn396q2","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ51Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ53Ӻ","endOffset":857°Ӻ,"quote":"Suppose a very young child applies the word dog to every four-legged creature he sees. He may have abstracted a limited set of attributes and created a large category, but his abstraction will now show up in his vocabulary. Parents will not provide him with a conventional name for his category, e.g., quadruped, but instead will require him to narrow his use of dog to its proper range...\nThe child who spontaneously hits on the category four-legged animals will be required to give it up in favor of dogs, cats, horses, cows, and the like ... The schoolboy who learns the word quadruped has abstracted from differentiated and named subor- dinates. The child he was abstracted through a failure to differentiate. Abstraction after differentiation may be the mature process, and abstraction from a failure to differentiate the primitive.\nCategorizing experiential objects in the particular way prescribed by the language the child has to acquire is, of course, not quite the same as deriving an object-concept from two or more experiences (see “Equivalence and Continuity,” below). But in both cases differentiation and abstraction seem to play much the same role. In the naming of objects it is the conventional nature of linguistic expressions that compels the child to structure his concepts in a certain way. In the construction of recursively usable object-concepts it is the organism’s active search for recurrence and regularity that compels it to create “sameness” by focusing on similarities and disregarding differences. In Piagetian terms, this active imposition of invariance on instances of experience that are always different in some way is the ubiquitous process of assimilation.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321069698803386308882":^°°,^"jQuery321069698803386308882":^°°,^"jQuery321069698803386308882":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Argumentation2","data_creacio":1561378326929°
|
Thema | Erfahrung |
---|
Thema | Wahrnehmung |
---|