Annotation:Text:Cybernetics, Experience, and the Concept of Self/H6q3sggmy8
< Annotation:Text:Cybernetics, Experience, and the Concept of Self
Revision as of 18:09, 24 June 2019 by Sarah Oberbichler (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{WissenschaftlicheReferenz2 |field_radiobutton=Theorie }} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Text:Cybernetics,_Experience,_and_the_Concept_of_Self |LastModificationDate=2019-06-2...")
| Referenztyp: | Theorie |
|---|
| Annotation of | Text:Cybernetics,_Experience,_and_the_Concept_of_Self |
|---|---|
| Annotation Comment | |
| Last Modification Date | 2019-06-24T19:09:20.508Z |
| Last Modification User | User:Sarah Oberbichler |
| Annotation Metadata | ^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"H6q3sggmy8","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/blockquoteӶ8Ӻ/pӶ1Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/blockquoteӶ8Ӻ/pӶ1Ӻ","endOffset":681°Ӻ,"quote":"Permanent “things” again; the “same” thing and its various “appearances” and “alterations”; the different “kinds” of thing ... it is only the smallest part of his experience’s flux that anyone actually does straighten out by applying to it these conceptual instruments. Out of them all our lowest ancestors probably used only, and then most vaguely and inaccurately, the notion of “the same again.” But even then if you had asked them whether the same were a “thing” that had endured throughout the unseen interval, they would probably have been at a loss, and would have said that they had never asked that question, or considered matters in that light (James, 1907/1955, p. 119).","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321069698803386308882":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"WissenschaftlicheReferenz2","data_creacio":1561396160194°
|
