Annotation:Text:Knowing without Metaphysics: Aspects of the Radical Constructivist Position/H4pos2svss

Referenztyp:	Theorie

Annotation of	Text:Knowing_without_Metaphysics:_Aspects_of_the_Radical_Constructivist_Position
Annotation Comment
Last Modification Date	2019-07-01T13:29:33.000Z
Last Modification User	User:Sarah Oberbichler
Annotation Metadata	^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"H4pos2svss","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ13Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ13Ӻ","endOffset":999°Ӻ,"quote":"Hans Vaihinger, apparently without drawing on the much earlier analyses of Jeremy Bentham, created the most comprehensive and consistent work on conceptual ‘fictions’. His Philosophy of As If (1913)Ӷ6Ӻ has become particularly interesting today, given the revolution in the philosophy of science and the recognition that, even in the ‘hard’ sciences, key concepts can be considered convenient ideal fictions. While Vaihinger provides endless ammunition for contemporary constructivists, I would not classify him as ‘radical’, because when everything is said and done, he anchors the conceptual apparatus that produces the ‘fictitious’ concepts in the theory of biological evolution. In doing so, he tacitly attributes ontological status to that theory. Konrad Lorenz incidentally falls into the same trap when he argues that the fact that human organisms have evolved and successfully use the categories of space and time, proves that these categories pertain to an ‘objective’ reality (1977: 9-10).","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321080850240369413962":^°°,^"jQuery321080850240369413962":^°°,^"jQuery321080850240369413962":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"WissenschaftlicheReferenz2","data_creacio":1561980572687°