Annotation:Text:Knowing without Metaphysics: Aspects of the Radical Constructivist Position/Jt1ex8kuma

Annotation of	Text:Knowing_without_Metaphysics:_Aspects_of_the_Radical_Constructivist_Position
Annotation Comment
Last Modification Date	2019-07-01T13:37:14.539Z
Last Modification User	User:Sarah Oberbichler
Annotation Metadata	^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Jt1ex8kuma","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ17Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ17Ӻ","endOffset":859°Ӻ,"quote":"To embark on the radical constructivist path, thus, means to relinquish the age-old untestable requirement that knowledge must match the world as it might ‘exist’ independently of our experience; instead, one demands of knowledge that it prove itself by a functional fit. From my perspective, those who merely speak of the construction of knowledge, but do not explicitly give up the notion that our conceptual constructions can or should in some way represent an independent, ‘objective’ reality, are still caught up in the traditional theory of knowledge that is defenseless against the sceptics’ arguments. From an epistemological point of view, therefore, their constructivism is trivial. Trivial constructivism manifests itself in professionals who treat the knowledge of others as subjective construction and never doubt the ‘objectivity’ of their own.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321080850240369413962":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Innovationsdiskurs2","data_creacio":1561981034231°

Innovationstyp	Kritik am trivialen Konstruktivismus