Annotation:Text:Learning and Adaptation in the Theory of Constructivism/La4b3dikao

Referenztyp:	Theorie

Annotation of	Text:Learning_and_Adaptation_in_the_Theory_of_Constructivism
Annotation Comment
Last Modification Date	2019-07-02T18:46:32.984Z
Last Modification User	User:Sarah Oberbichler
Annotation Metadata	^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"La4b3dikao","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ17Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ18Ӻ","endOffset":558°Ӻ,"quote":"Piaget thus adopted the three-part sequence of the infant’s reflex as the basic structure of goal-directed sensorimotor activity. He called it action scheme (schèmeӶ4Ӻ) and built on it, with the help of his concepts of assimilation and accommodation, a revolutionary learning theory.\nThe student of Piaget’s writings, however, will not find this theory neatly formulated and described in any one place. Its development, presumably, took time and was spread in bits and pieces over a number of different publications (e.g. Piaget, 1937, 1945, 1967). As Bärbel Inhelder, Piaget’s constant and most important collaborator, remarked, “the notion of scheme has given and is still giving rise to different interpretations” (Inhelder & de Caprona, 1992, \np.41). The interpretation I am presenting here has proven the most useful in our applications.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321088360461005206332":^°°,^"jQuery321088360461005206332":^°°,^"jQuery321088360461005206332":^°°,^"jQuery321088360461005206332":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"WissenschaftlicheReferenz2","data_creacio":1562085981899°