Annotation:Text:The Development of Language as Purposive Behavior/Itzffa5nhs

Referenztyp:	Theorie

Annotation of	Text:The_Development_of_Language_as_Purposive_Behavior
Annotation Comment
Last Modification Date	2019-07-04T20:19:56.670Z
Last Modification User	User:Sarah Oberbichler
Annotation Metadata	^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Itzffa5nhs","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ8Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ8Ӻ","endOffset":878°Ӻ,"quote":"It was precisely the lack of a functional model, such as a feedback system, that compelled Hofstadter, a few years earlier, to ascribe only descriptive but not explanatory power to his brilliant analysis of “objective teleology”Ӷ15Ӻ. The subsequent development of control theory and the application of the feedback model in the study of cognitive behavior gave Hofstadter’s logical exposition an almost prophetic quality. He sums up his description of objectively observable teleology: Thus the unitary attribute of the teleological actor is not the possession of end alone, or sensitivity alone, or technique alone, but of all three in inseparable combination. (Hofstadter’s emphasis.) He goes on to say that, “although they cannot be separated in the unitary attribute, they may nevertheless be analyzed independently by the use of a plurality of acts of the same agent”.Ӷ16Ӻ","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery3210198368474700013622":^°°,^"jQuery3210198368474700013622":^°°,^"jQuery3210198368474700013622":^°°,^"jQuery3210198368474700013622":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"WissenschaftlicheReferenz2","data_creacio":1562264395790°