Annotation:Annotationen:Conceptual Models in Educational Research and Practice/Frhb3rw86n

From DigiVis
< Annotation:Annotationen:Conceptual Models in Educational Research and Practice
Revision as of 13:27, 23 July 2019 by Sarah Oberbichler (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Schlussfolgerung3}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Annotationen:Conceptual_Models_in_Educational_Research_and_Practice |AnnotationComment=That is to say, no matter how hard...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Annotation of Annotationen:Conceptual_Models_in_Educational_Research_and_Practice
Annotation Comment That is to say, no matter how hard investigators try to adapt their analyses to the “foreign” ways of children, the model they build up will always be a model constructed out of concepts that are necessarily the investigators’. Because children’s ways of thinking are never directly accessible, the investigators’ model can never be compared to a child’s thought in order to determine whether there is or is not a perfect match. The most one can hope for is that the model fits whatever observations one has made and, more importantly, that it remains viable in the face of new observations.
Last Modification Date 2019-07-23T14:27:26.990Z
Last Modification User User:Sarah Oberbichler
Annotation Metadata
^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Frhb3rw86n","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ7Ӻ","startOffset":1189,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ7Ӻ","endOffset":1780°Ӻ,"quote":"That is to say, no matter how hard investigators try to adapt their analyses to the “foreign” ways of children, the model they build up will always be a model constructed out of concepts that are necessarily the investigators’. Because children’s ways of thinking are never directly accessible, the investigators’ model can never be compared to a child’s thought in order to determine whether there is or is not a perfect match. The most one can hope for is that the model fits whatever observations one has made and, more importantly, that it remains viable in the face of new observations.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery3210092476566737965452":^°°Ӻ,"text":"That is to say, no matter how hard investigators try to adapt their analyses to the “foreign” ways of children, the model they build up will always be a model constructed out of concepts that are necessarily the investigators’. Because children’s ways of thinking are never directly accessible, the investigators’ model can never be compared to a child’s thought in order to determine whether there is or is not a perfect match. The most one can hope for is that the model fits whatever observations one has made and, more importantly, that it remains viable in the face of new observations.","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Schlussfolgerung3","data_creacio":1563884840369°