Annotation:Text:Why I Consider Myself a Cybernetician/F6iht11c7k

From DigiVis
< Annotation:Text:Why I Consider Myself a Cybernetician
Revision as of 10:26, 21 August 2019 by Sarah Oberbichler (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Argumentation2}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Text:Why_I_Consider_Myself_a_Cybernetician |LastModificationDate=2019-08-21T11:25:54.771Z |LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Ob...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Annotation of Text:Why_I_Consider_Myself_a_Cybernetician
Annotation Comment
Last Modification Date 2019-08-21T11:25:54.771Z
Last Modification User User:Sarah Oberbichler
Annotation Metadata
^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"F6iht11c7k","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ13Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ14Ӻ","endOffset":355°Ӻ,"quote":"Piaget did not start out as a psychologist or as a philosopher. He started out as a biologist. When he speaks of “adaptation” or “adaptedness”, he uses these terms in their original biological sense. To understand him, one has to have a clear idea of what adaptation meant to Darwin, Mark Baldwin, and others who influenced Piaget during his formative years. This meaning is not at all abstract but practical. Any organism that manages to get by the constraints set by its environment is adapted.\nWhen Piaget applied this notion to the activity of knowing, he stepped out of the epistemological tradition of the Western world. Knowledge was no longer expected to provide a “true” picture of an absolute reality – something the sceptics of all ages had shown to be impossible. Instead, it was to be seen as a means towards the organism’s equilibration.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery3210302923750808538062":^°°,^"jQuery3210302923750808538062":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Argumentation2","data_creacio":1566379554392°
Thema Wissen
Thema Realität
Thema Anpassung