Annotation:Text:Homage to Jean Piaget (1896–1980)/U1ijnbtwj3
< Annotation:Text:Homage to Jean Piaget (1896–1980)
Revision as of 15:38, 20 September 2019 by Sarah Oberbichler (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Argumentation2}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Text:Homage_to_Jean_Piaget_(1896–1980) |LastModificationDate=2019-09-20T16:37:50.331Z |LastModificationUser=User:Sarah Ober...")
Annotation of | Text:Homage_to_Jean_Piaget_(1896–1980) |
---|---|
Annotation Comment | |
Last Modification Date | 2019-09-20T16:37:50.331Z |
Last Modification User | User:Sarah Oberbichler |
Annotation Metadata | ^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"U1ijnbtwj3","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ11Ӻ","startOffset":711,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ11Ӻ","endOffset":3377°Ӻ,"quote":"Piaget elaborated the notion of reflection on mental operations, and provided a model for how it operates in conjunction with abstraction and generalization. Thus he provided a theory of learning that successfully resolves the so-called ‘learning paradox’, a problem we inherited from Plato. It concerns the generation of new knowledge, which in Plato’s theory was God-given and accessible only through the mystical pipeline of reincarnation. Piaget’s reflective abstraction opened the door to fortuitous conjecture, the kind of imaginative ‘what-if’ assumptions that Charles Peirce incorporated in logic as abduction. \nI see abduction as an integral part of accommodation. Peirce described it as a simple process. If we experience a surprising event – it may be a pleasant surprise or a disagreeable one – we try to discover what caused it. If we isolate some novelty in the situation, we may conjecture a rule that says: if such and such is the case, we get this surprising result. \nThis conjecture constitutes an abduction, because it is not drawn from prior experience. We may then test the hypothetical rule – and if it is confirmed, we have an accommodation, because we have in fact generated a new rule that can serve us as a scheme of action. There is nothing paradoxical in this form of learning, nor does it require a mystical explanation. What it does require is an active mind that is able to reflect upon what it perceives and upon its own operations. There is no doubt that we have such minds. \nLet me give you a very simple example. It is a charming anecdote I read, but cannot remember where. A little girl is walking, and every now and then she pushes her ball to roll ahead. As the path begins to go up a hill, the ball, to her surprise, comes rolling back. And she asks: “How does the ball know where I am?.” \nThe little girl’s question demonstrates that she is at least to some extent aware of her experience and can reflect upon it. Only a reflective mind, a mind that is looking for order in the baffling world of experience, could formulate such a question. It is the kind of question that, after innumerable further trials and untenable assumptions, would lead an imaginative thinker with the stamina of Galilei, to an explanatory principle such as ‘gravitation’. \nWe have no idea what it is that gives us this internal awareness and the power to reflect. But we know that we have it. As you are listening to me now, you can become aware of your own listening. And as I am speaking to you, I can become aware of what I am doing and ask myself, why can I not say all this more simply? – We know that we can reflect, but we do not know how.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321030574901961068182":^°°,^"jQuery321030574901961068182":^°°,^"jQuery321030574901961068182":^°°,^"jQuery321030574901961068182":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Argumentation2","data_creacio":1568990268094°
|
Thema | Wissen |
---|
Thema | {{{field_text_autocomplete}}}Property "Ist Thema" (as page type) with input value "{{{field_text_autocomplete}}}" contains invalid characters or is incomplete and therefore can cause unexpected results during a query or annotation process. |
---|