Annotation:Text:Why Constructivism Must be Radical/Ja95xzq48o
< Annotation:Text:Why Constructivism Must be Radical
Revision as of 16:56, 20 September 2019 by Sarah Oberbichler (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Innovationsdiskurs2}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Text:Why_Constructivism_Must_be_Radical |LastModificationDate=2019-09-20T17:56:09.434Z |LastModificationUser=User:Sarah...")
Annotation of | Text:Why_Constructivism_Must_be_Radical |
---|---|
Annotation Comment | |
Last Modification Date | 2019-09-20T17:56:09.434Z |
Last Modification User | User:Sarah Oberbichler |
Annotation Metadata | ^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Ja95xzq48o","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ2Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ2Ӻ","endOffset":641°Ӻ,"quote":"During the 20th century, Jean Piaget was in the forefront of the development of constructivism and the struggle to overcome conventional ideas about the acquisition of knowledge. In the course of Western history, most philosophers tackled the following epistemological questions: “What is knowledge? How does one come to know? Can knowledge be certain?” They arrived at their answers using a logic they considered to be universal and independent of human subjects. Piaget broke with this tradition by raising a question which appeared to be simpler and more pragmatic: “How does a child manage to acquire what goes by the name of knowledge?”","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery3210413197432160228862":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Innovationsdiskurs2","data_creacio":1568994968863°
|
Innovationstyp | Bruch mit der klassischen Erkenntnistheorie |
---|