Annotation:Text:Why Constructivism Must be Radical/N55jmyfozi

From DigiVis
< Annotation:Text:Why Constructivism Must be Radical
Revision as of 17:19, 20 September 2019 by Sarah Oberbichler (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{WissenschaftlicheReferenz2 |field_radiobutton=Theorie }} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Text:Why_Constructivism_Must_be_Radical |LastModificationDate=2019-09-20T18:19:25.827...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Referenztyp: Theorie
Annotation of Text:Why_Constructivism_Must_be_Radical
Annotation Comment
Last Modification Date 2019-09-20T18:19:25.827Z
Last Modification User User:Sarah Oberbichler
Annotation Metadata
^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"N55jmyfozi","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ5Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ5Ӻ","endOffset":681°Ӻ,"quote":"In this connection, it is important to point out that in the case of a cognitive organism, adaptation proceeds on two levels. On the biological level, adaptation is aimed at survival; on the conceptual level, adaptation is aimed at producing coherent, non-contradictory structures.\nI have explained elsewhere the reasons which appear to me to support such a radicalization, first in the domain of history of philosophy (Glasersfeld, 1978, 1985), then in connection with the functioning of natural languages (Glasersfeld, 1983, 1990) and then again on the field of cybernetics ^Glasersfeld, 1979, 1981). For the purposes of this presentation, I will only take up a few basic points.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery3210413197432160228862":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"WissenschaftlicheReferenz2","data_creacio":1568996365475°