Annotation:Text:On the Concept of Interpretation/L917bh2du4

Annotation of	Text:On_the_Concept_of_Interpretation
Annotation Comment
Last Modification Date	2019-09-30T21:32:58.628Z
Last Modification User	User:Sarah Oberbichler
Annotation Metadata	^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"L917bh2du4","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ6Ӻ","startOffset":1930,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ6Ӻ","endOffset":2397°Ӻ,"quote":"n fact, the requirement that an interpretation of X, in order to be considered a good or correct interpretation, must match the meaning an originator has associated with X, is just another manifestation of the epistemological ingenuousness that leads realists to the unwarranted belief that what we experience should in some way correspond to an ontological reality and that, if only we try hard enough, we shall finally have a true picture of the world as it is.Ӷ1Ӻ","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery3210210076023618886662":^°°,^"jQuery3210210076023618886662":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Innovationsdiskurs2","data_creacio":1569871977883°

Innovationstyp	Kritik an der traditionellen Erkenntnistheorie