Annotation:Text:Anticipation in the Constructivist Theory of Cognition/R5ptbem2ld
< Annotation:Text:Anticipation in the Constructivist Theory of Cognition
Revision as of 16:48, 6 December 2019 by Sarah Oberbichler (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Narrativ2 |field_radiobutton=Rahmenerzählung }} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Text:Anticipation_in_the_Constructivist_Theory_of_Cognition |LastModificationDate=2019-12-06T...")
Narrativtyp: | Rahmenerzählung |
---|
Annotation of | Text:Anticipation_in_the_Constructivist_Theory_of_Cognition |
---|---|
Annotation Comment | |
Last Modification Date | 2019-12-06T16:48:33.250Z |
Last Modification User | User:Sarah Oberbichler |
Annotation Metadata | ^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"R5ptbem2ld","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ2Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ2Ӻ","endOffset":1631°Ӻ,"quote":"I am not a computer scientist and I do not speak the languages of Quantum Computation, Hyperincursion, or Cellular Automata. But a couple of weeks ago I read some of the prose sections of Robert Rosen’s Anticipatory Systems, and it gave me the hope that the “anticipation” referred to in the title of this conference would not be altogether different from the anticipations we depend on in managing and planning our ordinary lives as human beings. It is a topic I have been concerned with throughout the many years that I battled against the mindless excesses of the behaviorist doctrine in psychology. I was involved with languages and conceptual semantics, and I was among those outsiders who thought that, when people speak, they mostly have a purpose and are concerned with the effect their words will have. This view was generally considered to be unscientific, and I am therefore very happy that “anticipatory systems” have now become a subject for open discussion among “hard” scientists. \nSince most of you are probably deeply immersed in specialized research of a more or less technical nature, you may not have had occasion to consider that anticipation would have to be a fundamental building block of any theory of psychology that merits to be called cognitive. And you may not have had reason to wonder why the discipline that is now called ‘Cognitive Science’ still has not moved very far from the input/output, stimulus/response paradigm. But although everyone now agrees that intelligence and intelligent behavior are the business of a MIND, few are ready to concede much autonomy to that rather indefinite entity.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321076360346168969132":^°°,^"jQuery321076360346168969132":^°°,^"jQuery321076360346168969132":^°°,^"jQuery321076360346168969132":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Narrativ2","data_creacio":1575647312737°
|