Annotation:Text:Teleology and the Concepts of Causation/Tkjbd419fp

From DigiVis
< Annotation:Text:Teleology and the Concepts of Causation
Revision as of 12:39, 11 December 2019 by Sarah Oberbichler (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Annotation of Text:Teleology_and_the_Concepts_of_Causation
Annotation Comment
Last Modification Date 2019-12-11T12:39:51.945Z
Last Modification User User:Sarah Oberbichler
Annotation Metadata
^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Tkjbd419fp","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ5Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ5Ӻ","endOffset":716°Ӻ,"quote":"To this influence of the history of physics on the Western way of thinking, one must add the thrust of the behaviorist doctrine in this century. Skinner’s campaign succeeded to an extraordinary extent in excluding from the scientific domain not only human mind and meaning, but also all manifestations of intelligence in animals. Living organisms were to be squeezed into the Newtonian clockwork image of the world (in spite of the fact that theoretical physics had already moved beyond that conception). Consequently, the powerful establishment of behaviorist psychology branded intention, purpose, and goal-directedness as dirty words, and did its best to expurgate them as relatives of the concept of final cause.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321096051066034122692":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","category":"Innovationsdiskurs2","data_creacio":1576064349617°
Innovationstyp Kritik an der traditionellen Erkenntnistheorie