Annotation:Text:Hans G. Furth – Not Radical enough: A critique of von Glasersfeld’s Radical Epistemology/Ldrsftuahu

Annotation of	Text:Hans_G._Furth_–_Not_Radical_enough:_A_critique_of_von_Glasersfeld’s_Radical_Epistemology
Annotation Comment
Last Modification Date	2020-01-17T11:42:56.668Z
Last Modification User	User:Sarah Oberbichler
Annotation Metadata	^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Ldrsftuahu","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ8Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ8Ӻ","endOffset":520°Ӻ,"quote":"((8)) Nevertheless, by never clearly referring to sensorimotor or action know-how as preceding mental object know-how, von Glasersfeld fails to highlight what I would consider the most conspicuous and most constructivist component of Piaget’s theory of knowledge. Namely that action, not perception, is the key concept of an adequate theory of knowledge and that we humans in development first construct the reality of sensorimotor action knowledge before we continue to construct the reality of mental object knowledge","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery32101117355615537122":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"ArgumentationFremd","data_creacio":1579257776319°

Thema	Wissen
Bezieht sich auf Argumentation:
Relation:	alternativ