Annotation:Text:Hans G. Furth – Not Radical enough: A critique of von Glasersfeld’s Radical Epistemology/Y3qw4o5osk

Annotation of	Text:Hans_G._Furth_–_Not_Radical_enough:_A_critique_of_von_Glasersfeld’s_Radical_Epistemology
Annotation Comment
Last Modification Date	2020-01-17T12:03:36.923Z
Last Modification User	User:Sarah Oberbichler
Annotation Metadata	^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Y3qw4o5osk","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ16Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ17Ӻ","endOffset":215°Ӻ,"quote":"((16)) Moreover, I agree with von Glasersfeld (62) that short of a transcendent basis, a radical constructivism is a potent ground for rejecting a crude ethical relativism “where anything goes.” By seeing us as constructors of our reality/society, I at the same time stress my responsibility for a world that we now threaten with extinction and I acknowledge the quasi biological social constraints (such as sharing of symbols or mutual relations) that are already evident in spontaneous child development. \n((17)) In conclusion, von Glasersfeld’s “radical” theory of knowledge certainly points in the right direction, but seems to me to lack the full radicalness that I detect, explicitly or implicitly, in Piaget’s work.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery32101117355615537122":^°°,^"jQuery32101117355615537122":^°°,^"jQuery32101117355615537122":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"ArgumentationFremd","data_creacio":1579259016419°

Thema	Realität
Bezieht sich auf Argumentation:
Relation:	verträglich