Annotation:Annotationen:Teleology and the Concepts of Causation/Ptohla9ckc
< Annotation:Annotationen:Teleology and the Concepts of Causation
Revision as of 20:29, 17 January 2020 by Sarah Oberbichler (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Schlussfolgerung3}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Annotationen:Teleology_and_the_Concepts_of_Causation |AnnotationComment=Where evolution is concerned, then, there is no ha...")
Annotation of | Annotationen:Teleology_and_the_Concepts_of_Causation |
---|---|
Annotation Comment | Where evolution is concerned, then, there is no harm in using ‘purpose of’ as a descriptive tool, provided one does not mistake it for the purpose for, which would imply a guiding outside force that intentionally designed the thing one is describing. |
Last Modification Date | 2020-01-17T20:29:05.844Z |
Last Modification User | User:Sarah Oberbichler |
Annotation Metadata | ^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Ptohla9ckc","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ14Ӻ","startOffset":622,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/divӶ14Ӻ","endOffset":872°Ӻ,"quote":"Where evolution is concerned, then, there is no harm in using ‘purpose of’ as a descriptive tool, provided one does not mistake it for the purpose for, which would imply a guiding outside force that intentionally designed the thing one is describing.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery3210238226333597001072":^°°,^"jQuery3210238226333597001072":^°°,^"jQuery3210238226333597001072":^°°Ӻ,"text":"Where evolution is concerned, then, there is no harm in using ‘purpose of’ as a descriptive tool, provided one does not mistake it for the purpose for, which would imply a guiding outside force that intentionally designed the thing one is describing.","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Schlussfolgerung3","data_creacio":1579289345562°
|