Annotation:Text:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/Sl1nqq2m3m
< Annotation:Text:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking
Revision as of 18:25, 27 January 2020 by Sarah Oberbichler (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Argumentation2}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Text:The_Reluctance_to_Change_a_Way_of_Thinking |LastModificationDate=2020-01-27T18:24:54.290Z |LastModificationUser=User:Sar...")
Annotation of | Text:The_Reluctance_to_Change_a_Way_of_Thinking |
---|---|
Annotation Comment | |
Last Modification Date | 2020-01-27T18:24:54.290Z |
Last Modification User | User:Sarah Oberbichler |
Annotation Metadata | ^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Sl1nqq2m3m","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ19Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ21Ӻ","endOffset":580°Ӻ,"quote":"For the observing biologist, of course, this viability refers to the fit with an external environment. For the constructivist, whose interest is focused exclusively on the cognitive domain in which there is no access to an external environment, viability and fit must always refer to the cognizing subject’s experiential world.\nThis shift of meaning was most convincingly explained and demonstrated by Jakob von Uexküll in the early decades of this century. In his charming account (whose title was translated as Strolls through the environments of animals and menӶ5Ӻ), he showed that every living organism in fact creates two coordinated environments for itself: an environment of actions (Wirkwelt) and an environment of perception (Merkwelt). Both these environments are necessarily subjective, because the first depends on the particular organism’s capabilities of acting, and the second on the range of the organism’s sensory equipment.\nFinally, it must be made clear that, while biologists may tend to think of viability and adaptedness in terms of differential reproduction, in the cognitive domain the two terms refer to the achievement and maintenance of internal equilibrium. For the constructivist, therefore, Knowledge has the function of eliminating perturbations; and the higher we move in the hierarchy of conceptual abstractions, the more the perturbations tend to be conceptual rather than material. This, obviously, is one of the features that make the constructivist approach interesting for therapists.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321049035480219443762":^°°,^"jQuery321049035480219443762":^°°,^"jQuery321049035480219443762":^°°,^"jQuery321049035480219443762":^°°,^"jQuery321049035480219443762":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Argumentation2","data_creacio":1580145894064°
|
Thema | Anpassung |
---|
Thema | Viabilität |
---|