Annotation:Text:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking/Jpoqoth39t

From DigiVis
< Annotation:Text:The Reluctance to Change a Way of Thinking
Revision as of 18:35, 27 January 2020 by Sarah Oberbichler (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Argumentation2}} {{TextAnnotation |AnnotationOf=Text:The_Reluctance_to_Change_a_Way_of_Thinking |LastModificationDate=2020-01-27T18:35:44.310Z |LastModificationUser=User:Sar...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search
Annotation of Text:The_Reluctance_to_Change_a_Way_of_Thinking
Annotation Comment
Last Modification Date 2020-01-27T18:35:44.310Z
Last Modification User User:Sarah Oberbichler
Annotation Metadata
^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Jpoqoth39t","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ28Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ30Ӻ","endOffset":390°Ӻ,"quote":"One of the revolutionary aspects of the constructivist approach to communication, then, is that it drastically changes the concept of “understanding”. There can no longer be the claim that the meanings of words must be shared by the users of a language because these meanings are derived from fixed, external entities. Instead, here once more, there is at best a relation of fit. That is to say, we tend to conclude that what we have said is understood by the listener if the way he or she reacts to our utterance seems compatible with our expectations. But as we discover only too often, what seemed understanding at first, disintegrates when a seemingly unproblematic utterance leads to quite unexpected reactions in a new situation.\nUnderstanding what other speakers mean by what they have said, therefore, cannot possibly be explained by the assumption that we have managed to replicate in our heads the identical conceptual structures they intended to “express”. At best we may come to the conclusion that our interpretation of their words and sentences seems compatible with the model of their thinking and acting that we have built up in the course of our interactions with them.\nOur knowledge of others, in short, is essentially no different from our knowledge of the world. Because it is the result of our own perceiving and conceiving, it cannot be a true representation of independently existing entities; but insofar as we can use it as a basis for further acting and thinking it constitutes a viable model of these very special elements of our experiential world.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321049035480219443762":^°°,^"jQuery321049035480219443762":^°°,^"jQuery321049035480219443762":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"Argumentation2","data_creacio":1580146544091°
Thema Sprache
Thema Wissen