Annotation:Text:The Radical Constructivist View of Science/Mcr09vl07x

Referenztyp:	Theorie

Annotation of	Text:The_Radical_Constructivist_View_of_Science
Annotation Comment
Last Modification Date	2020-01-27T19:36:37.993Z
Last Modification User	User:Sarah Oberbichler
Annotation Metadata	^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Mcr09vl07x","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ7Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ8Ӻ","endOffset":420°Ӻ,"quote":"Karl Popper incorporated this observation in his ‘Conjectures and refutations’ and added as subtitle ‘The growth of scientific knowledge’ (Popper, 1968). He thought that this process was bound to lead science to a more and more adequate understanding of the real world. But he was unable to indicate how one could ever ascertain that the new conjectures were actually getting closer to such unquestionable ‘Truth’. This was one of the problems that had prompted Thomas Kuhn to try another approach.\nOne can certainly argue against details in Kuhn’s description of ‘scientific revolutions’ (1970), but no one can deny that every now and then the invention of wholly unforeseeable concepts has relegated previously held convictions to the growing scrap heap of explanatory theories. The image of the scientist gradually unveiling the mysteries of a world that is and forever remains what it is, does not seem appropriate.","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321070364888847511052":^°°,^"jQuery321070364888847511052":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"WissenschaftlicheReferenz2","data_creacio":1580150197446°