Annotation:Text:The Logic of Scientific Fallibility/Sifc5dnp71

Referenztyp:	Theorie

Annotation of	Text:The_Logic_of_Scientific_Fallibility
Annotation Comment
Last Modification Date	2020-01-29T14:04:55.710Z
Last Modification User	User:Sarah Oberbichler
Annotation Metadata	^"permissions":^"read":ӶӺ,"update":ӶӺ,"delete":ӶӺ,"admin":ӶӺ°,"user":^"id":6,"name":"Sarah Oberbichler"°,"id":"Sifc5dnp71","ranges":Ӷ^"start":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ16Ӻ","startOffset":0,"end":"/divӶ3Ӻ/divӶ4Ӻ/divӶ1Ӻ/pӶ20Ӻ","endOffset":157°Ӻ,"quote":"Maturana divides the scientific procedure into four steps:Ӷ2Ӻ\n1. Observation. In order to count as “scientific,” an observation must be carried\nout under certain constraints, and the constraints must be made explicit (so\nthat the observation can be repeated).\n2. By relating the observations, a model is inductively derived—usually a model\nthat involves causal connections. (Often an idea of the model precedes the\nobservations of step (1) and to some extent determines their constraints.)\n3. By deduction, a prediction is derived from the model, a prediction that\nconcerns an event that has not yet been observed.\n4. The scientist then sets out to observe the predicted event, and this\nobservation must again comply with the constraints that governed\nobservation in (1).","highlights":Ӷ^"jQuery321049352358140712142":^°°,^"jQuery321049352358140712142":^°°,^"jQuery321049352358140712142":^°°,^"jQuery321049352358140712142":^°°,^"jQuery321049352358140712142":^°°,^"jQuery321049352358140712142":^°°Ӻ,"text":"","order":"mw-content-text","category":"WissenschaftlicheReferenz2","data_creacio":1580303095128°